Independent media, news reporting, analysis, opinion, forensic historical research presentations. From a Libertarian to Anarcho-Libertarian Anti-Federalist perspective.
We at RTR Truth Media have been defamed by YouTube and censored by nearly all social media entities when our long standing rules here are to only present something as fact when we have the evidence to back that up, and when we give potential analysis based on our experience and existence of circumstantial evidence we are always clear to say that we are not as of yet convinced lacking the smoking gun. We ALWAYS clarify opinion or fact, yet we have had a video of the Texas State House in session, listed on YouTube as UNLISTED as the claims being made in the video we wanted to seriously fact check.
WHILE IN THE PROCESS OF FACT CHECKING WE RECEIVED A STRIKE AND THE VIDEO WAS REMOVED BASED ON - GET THIS LIE - A “COMMUNITY GUIDELINES COMPLAINT” - Would someone like to explain to me how anyone could watch the unlisted video I never gave anyone the link to?
Would someone also like to explain to me how it was that I downloaded the video from official Texas government operations - a video I downloaded from YouTube?
Well along with being completely vindicated about our position against Dr. “should be tried for serial homicide” Fauci, and about Wuhan and the lab were spot on.
As we were being shadowbanned and outright censored, penalized and have not been able to upload videos nearly during the entire plannedemic, these Silicone Valley monopolists of media were silencing is and many others, all
I can say is that each and every entity that engaged in said silencing should rightfully be charged as criminal conspirators lending material support to enemies of the united States.
I will be seriously and deeply considering filing suit against any and all entities that engaged in silencing our voice. And yes, we will in part be arguing 1st Amendment grounds as the infrastructure to the architecture of the internet itself as well as Google, which leads to YouTube, that brazenly accepts massive amounts of cash for political purposes but which clearly has a partisan bias and has demonstrated that the corporation has been and continues to be used as a tool to silence any form of resistance to the Marxist infused political biases it holds. Google is responsible for bringing a subversive destructive ideology forward and normalizing it. Google has engaged with psychological warfare against the American people. They advertised the service as a way and means to “broadcast ourselves” but has no intention of allowing us to do that if our positions run contrary to their “woke vision”.
By Barbara Ferguson
Arab News Correspondent
4-27-2002
#NeverForget
This is who YouTube has adjusting algorythims and censoring the American people. I am NOT ok with that.
Tom - RTR
WASHINGTON - The San Francisco
Superior Court has awarded former Congressman Pete McCloskey, R-California,
a $150,000 court judgment against the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
McCloskey, the attorney in the case, represented one of three civil lawsuits
filed in San Francisco against the ADL in 1993. The lawsuit came after
raids were made by the San Francisco Police Department and the FBI on
offices of the ADL in both San Francisco and Los Angeles, which found
that the ADL was engaged in extensive domestic spying operations on a
vast number of individuals and institutions around the country.
During the course of the inquiry in San Francisco, the SFPD and FBI determined
the ADL had computerized files on nearly 10,000 people across the country,
and that more than 75 percent of the information had been illegally obtained
from police, FBI files and state drivers, license data banks.
Much of the stolen information had been provided by Tom Gerard of the San
Francisco Police Department, who sold, or gave, the information to Ray
Bullock, ADL,s top undercover operative.
The investigation also determined that the ADL conduit, Gerard, was also
working with the CIA.
Two other similar suits against ADL were settled some years ago, and the
ADL was found guilty in both cases, but the McCloskey suit continued to
drag through the courts until last month.
In the McCloskey case, the ADL agreed to pay (from its annual multi-million
budget) $50,000 to each of the three plaintiffs - Jeffrey Blankfort, Steve
Zeltzer and Anne Poirier - who continued to press charges against the
ADL, despite a continuing series of judicial roadblocks that forced 14
of the original defendants to withdraw. Another two died during the proceedings.
The ADL, which calls itself a civil rights group, continued to claim it
did nothing wrong in monitoring their activities. Although the ADL presents
itself as a group that defends the interests of Jews, two of three ADL
victims are Jewish.
Blankfort and Zeltzer were targeted by the ADL because they were critical
of Israel,s policies toward the Palestinians.
The third ADL victim in the McCloskey case, Poirier, was not involved in
any activities related to Israel or the Middle East. Poirier ran a scholarship
program for South African exiles who were fighting the apartheid system
in South Africa.
At the time, the ADL worked closely with the then anti-apartheid government
of South Africa, and ADL,s operative Bullock provided ADL with illegally
obtained data on Poirier and her associates to the South African government.
But the conclusion of McCloskey's case does not mean the end to the ADL's
legal problems.
On March 31, 2001, US District Judge Edward Nottingham of Denver, Colorado,
upheld most of a $10.5 million defamation judgment that a federal jury
in Denver had levied against the ADL in April of 2000.
The jury hit the ADL with the massive judgment after finding it had falsely
labeled Evergreen, Colorado residents - William and Dorothy Quigley -
as "anti-Semites." The ADL is appealing the judgment.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Sharing content of individuals not members of our team does not mean we agree with or stand behind everything they stand for. We share news, as well as what we believe our readers need to know. Truth is truth, whomever may speak it.
Like a scene from, the Godfather 3 - when Micheal Corleone said - "every time I get out, they pull me back in". I do oppose political Zionism, but no, the Jews didn't do everything. In fact the majority of those who call; themselves Jews who commit many of the crimes culminating with the advancement of a global agenda do so on behalf of the World Communist movement. This also means that while they USE Jewish identity as a protective layer such as the antisemitic card, they are in actuality not Jewish at all. They are Atheists. Communists. And the goal of that movement is to destroy all religion but the one that will be pledged to the eventual "New World Order" or one world government. No, this is not a "conspiracy theory", but it is a conspiracy, and it is FACT. No better tool has been used by them than this. They used religious Jews as cannon fodder in Germany, while Adolph Hitler and company gave safe passage to the non religious Bolsheviks, who also ran the internment camps. Religious Jews opposed the Zionists for one main reason. The Torah forbade them establishing a Kingdom until the coming of their Messiah. In fact by taking it upon themselves to make this state happen, they would not only have to ignore but defy the Torah. Before too much noise could be made about it the religious Jews were put in Ghettos and internment camps.
So, from what Micheal Collins Piper was able to dig out, it appears as though it has been these Bolsheviks who have assumed this identity. 80% of the emigres flooding into Palestine between 1946-48 we KNOW this from the Presidential Daily briefing reports prepared by the CIA that I released a full report on not long after their release. The mainstream media remained silent. President Truman committed what is the equivalent of treason. I would also say deprivation of rights under the color of law as well for every person that died as a result of his supporting this foreign Rothschild Zionist state.
As a conservative and a Christian its been very difficult for me to reveal many facts to the public without being labeled or censored. I make no assertions that I do not have evidence to support. That is what makes plain ole folks like me so dangerous to many. I assure my readers that the only thing I really hate is evikl deeds and the doctrines that exist to justify them. You see a "religion" if it be ancient or secular, once embraced, it can cause us to suspend what would be typically our moral code because of some perceived threat. The threat does not have to be real. It can be the result of indoctrination for instance. This does not necessarily make the individual affected evil, or to be hated,. But this Neo-Marxist "have to tear it all down" ideology is poison. Many Americans now use in their vocabulary many disturbing words and phrases "hate speech, firearm, assault weapon,
you know words that have been used to combat and tear down our traditions, our way of life.
So as ma ny times as I have tried to find subjects that did not involve the Israelis, it seems more times than not, I have to try and fend off a constant stream of attacks. I dont cae if you support Israel or not, you had better defend my right to say it hgow I see it, as I would defnd yours... beause we as a people have strayed far away from handling things as they came. We have been asl;eep at the wheel.
\So Iran. It would appear that the Coronavirus has hit Iran like a storm. I believe it isd likely the worst out of all nations.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
This is one of the purest absolute verbal bitch slapping sessions I’ve seen in a while. Sondland is destroyed... left laying in a heap of ashes. Mike Turner took a ginsu to the programmed ignorance that many are afflicted with.
Statism. Putting your faith in government and “personalities” desiring for them to provide care and protection to them at the cost of liberty?
Freedom - Putting your faith and thoughts into “something/someone, and
It is so hard listening to this authoritarian newspeak manipulator, but it’s almost like one just can not believe how many people buy into the hypocrites like him that one must confirm that they actually exist. Almost like a moth to a flame, I watch while scratching my head.
Brian Young of the High Impact Flix channel decimated the hypocrisy in short order. While “Beta male” O’Rourke consistently champions a form of government we were supposed to completely avoid. This notion that defending “Democracy”, being so important that some political overlords feel the need to resort to dropping bombs on people, is the hallmark of a great idea. Oh yes, Democracy is so great you will either love it or lose your life. It reminds me of the scene from “The Godfather” when Micheal Corleone explains to his soon to be wife a contract his father wanted a Hollywood mogul to sign where mob enforcer Luca holds a gun to his head while his father explains that either his brains or his signature will be on the contact.
As Brian points out, Ben Franklin had some words to explain “Democracy” in its essence..
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what’s for dinner”!
A word of thanks to a good man, with courage and integrity, with a big heart, but the common sense to keep it in balance. Brian Young has caused me to pause on many occasions and literally stop and think. Many people have had really interesting comments on his content. Some admitted to disagreeing with on some things but admitted that he had positively challenged them, and in many situations. I attribute this to the mind control of government propaganda. In fact, If you asked me after watching his content to give a short few words to relay his message I would say ...
#PrinciplesOverParty and #FreedomFromTyranny
He has helped many content creators on YouTube who have been censored and wrongfully accused. I would like to publicly state my appreciation. It is an honor to call Brian Young my friend. Life seldomly provides the opportunity to have good friends. My father was a very wise. He said “you can count good friends on one hand, and usually have fingers to spare. How true.
While everyone was good and distracted by the carnival sideshow the Supreme Court Confirmation Hearing became which asked no actual valid questions regarding any in depth policy decisions, surveillance, Patriot Act, but resorted to frivolous attacks of one's alleged teen years...
... this was going down.
Even the main stream media can not ignore this -
An excerpt from:
CNN -
Google has finally admitted that a "Project Dragonfly" is indeed in the works.
But that's about all a Google executive was willing to divulge
Wednesday about the codenamed plan, which has been widely reported to be
a search product the company is developing for China — one that would
need to comply with government censorship.
The rumored existence of the Chinese search engine
came up repeatedly during a Senate committee hearing in Washington,
where several major technology and telecommunications executives were
testifying about a potential federal law to regulate data privacy.
Photo: Ng Han Guan (AP)
The prospect of a Google-sanctioned search engine for China has become a
hot-button issue. Reports began surfacing last month that Google was
working on a product that would block sensitive websites and search
terms in accordance with Chinese censorship.
The New York Times later reported that more than a thousand Google employees have questioned the plan. That criticism is ongoing — The Times reported early Wednesday that a former Google research scientist blasted the Chinese search product in a letter to lawmakers this week.
techcrunch:
In a letter
to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, former
Google research scientist Jack Poulson details why he stepped down from
the company in late August. The note, sent earlier this week, details
growing concern over Project Dragonfly, the search giant’s attempt to
enter the Chinese market in a meaningful way.
The
letter arrived as the Senate prepared to question Google’s new chief
privacy officer, Keith Enright, about data concerns. It seems likely
that the subject of Dragonfly will be on the schedule for committee
members. Nearly 1,400 employees signed a letter last month stating that the project, “raise[s] urgent moral and ethical issues.”
“It
is notable that Project Dragonfly was well underway at the time the
company released its AI Principles,” Poulson writes in his own letter.
“As has been widely understood, by human rights organizations,
investigative reporters, Google employees, and the public, Project
Dragonfly directly contradicts the AI Principles’ commitment to not
‘design or deploy’ any technology whose purpose ‘contravenes widely
accepted principles of […] human rights.’ ”
Poulson
highlights four specific issues that have caused concern internally at
the company. The list includes tying search queries to phone numbers and
a blacklist of search terms including “human rights,” “student protest”
and “Nobel Prize,” developed in conjunction with the Chinese
government. The former employee also highlights government control over
air quality data and the “catastrophic failure of the internal privacy
review process.”
Yesterday, reports surfaced that CEO Sundar Pichai will meet with Republican lawmakers to discuss Google’s China plans and GOP concerns over search bias.
General: Project Maven Is Just the Beginning of the Military’s Use of AI
Air Combat Command chief invites tech firms to help
build next-gen tools for the Pentagon. Also says dissent "is part of
being an American."
A top Air Force general said the military
needs to expand its use of artificial intelligence — like that being
used in the controversial Project Maven effort — if it wants to stay
ahead of peer competitors and deter war.
Gen. James Holmes, who leads Air Combat Command, is among the first
flag officers to publicly defend the Pentagon’s
algorithmic-image-analysis program since
“The benefit of this will be: it will free up people to focus on
thinking about what they see and what it means in the intelligence field
and on passing that information to decision makers more timely because
you’re able to do it faster,” Holmes said Thursday at a Defense Writers
Group breakfast in Washington. “That’s a big part of our future and
you’ll continue to see that expanded, with Project Maven being one of
the first steps in bringing learning machines and algorithms in to be
able to allow people to focus on things that people do best and let the
machine do that repetitive task.”
Earlier this week, Robert Work, who chartered Project Maven before
stepping down as deputy defense secretary last year, said that company
employees who worry that the Pentagon’s artificial intelligence will
kill people should should consider that it would increase risks for
someone else.
“They say, ‘What if the work is ultimately used to take lives? But
what if it saves American lives? 500 American lives? Or 500 lives of our
allies?” Work said Tuesday at the Defense One Tech Summit.
Holmes said he was concerned that the dustup with Google might prompt
others in Silicon Valley to not work with the Pentagon, but added:
“this is part of being an American.”
“Americans have expectations about what their government does and
whether the government uses technology and tools to infringe upon their
rights or not,” he said. “We have really high standards as a nation that
that things that we being forward as military tools have to live
up to.”
Still, Holmes said the military needs to tap into the technology being developed in the Valley and elsewhere.
Google employees have signed a letter protesting the company’s building of a censored search engine for China.
Hundreds of Google employees, upset at the company’s decision to secretly build a censored version of its search engine forChina, have signed a letter demanding more transparency to understand the ethical consequences of their work.
In this video, Jason Bermas of #WeAreChange gives you the latest breaking news on the very first church to worship artificial intelligence. The organization is called Way Of The Future and they intend to create their own God by bringing in the Singularity. No, this is far from a joke. They are serious, and they come from high places in the tech industry.
Ex-Google executive Anthony Levandowski is founding a church where people worship an artificial intelligence god. And what they are seeking can only be taken as a direct threat to humanity.
Way of the Future, the God-bot religion founded by Levandowski, has a website. And to say it is creepy is an understatement.
Way of the Future (WOTF) is about creating a peaceful and respectful transition of who is in charge of the planet from people to people + "machines". Given that technology will "relatively soon" be able to surpass human abilities, we want to help educate people about this exciting future and prepare a smooth transition. Help us spread the word that progress shouldn't be feared (or even worse locked up/caged). That we should think about how "machines" will integrate into society (and even have a path for becoming in charge as they become smarter and smarter) so that this whole process can be amicable and not confrontational. In "recent" years, we have expanded our concept of rights to both sexes, minority groups and even animals, let's make sure we find a way for "machines" to get rights too. Let's stop pretending we can hold back the development of intelligence when there are clear massive short term economic benefits to those who develop it and instead understand the future and have it treat us like a beloved elder who created it.
Levandowski and his "robot god" will in his mind, "take charge" of its human subjects as we relinquish our power to a creation with far more intelligence than our own.As a Christian and a student of history I can easily tell you that this is not remotely the kind of thing that the "freedom of religion" meant as in those days the authors mostly meant the differences of Christian sects, not the worship of false gods or idols.
He claims the good will be a 'billion times smarter than humans'.
The filed documents for WOTF give its purpose is to 'develop and promote the realisation of a Godhead based on Artificial Intelligence'.
They say it aims to 'through understanding and worship of the Godhead, contribute to the betterment of society'.
Levandowski's allegiance to singularity - the belief that artificial intelligence will one day grow to such efficiency that it surpasses and overpowers humans - is the basis of this new religion.
'In the future, if something is much, much smarter, there's going to be a transition as to who is actually in charge', Levandowski told Wired during a three-hour interview.
'What we want is the peaceful, serene transition of control of the planet from humans to whatever. And to ensure that the 'whatever' knows who helped it get along'.
The church also includes funding to help create a divine AI and will seek to build relationships with AI industry leaders.
The filings say workshops and educational programs are starting in the San Francisco area this year.
The religion was granted tax-exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service in August.
'The idea needs to spread before the technology,' said Levandowski, who lives in Berkeley and helped create Street View, Waymo and Uber's self-driving cars.
'The church is how we spread the word, the gospel. If you believe [in it], start a conversation with someone else and help them understand the same things.'
He claims followers of his new religion 'will be able to talk to God, literally, and know that it's listening.'
Yeah, that shouldn't concern us one bit right? What could possibly be more anti-God and anti-Christ than this concept?
Levandowski is one of the Silicon Valley titans who believes artificial intelligence will transform human existence and even dictate whether our species survives or not.
In October Elon Musk spoke out against Levandowski's proposals by tweeting that he should be 'on the list of people who should absolutely *not* be allowed to develop digital superintelligence'.
Earlier this year he warned that regulation of artificial intelligence is needed because it's a 'fundamental risk to the existence of human civilisation.'
The billionaire said regulations will stop humanity from being outsmarted by computers, or 'deep intelligence in the network', that can start wars by manipulating information.
Katy ISD Jordan Wooley with Texas Gov. Greg Abbot
Today Katy ISD 7th grader Jordan Wooley and her mom Chantel, were invited to the home of Texas Governor Greg Abbott, in Austin, to discuss what happened in her AP (Advanced Placement) reading class. Listen to my interview with Jordan's mom Chantel right after the visit. We applaud Gov. Abbott as he clearly has shown, the #IStandWithJordan movement is supported at the highest levels in Texas government.
Posted by Alice Linahan on Saturday, November 7, 2015
Alton Frailey Katy Texas, I.S.D. finally placed in a position where he "knows" that eyes are upon him. Lying and throwing a little girl who now has been proven to have been telling the truth in the "God is a Myth" scandal becoming known as Frailey Gate # who knows? As the amount of scandals and Constitutional violations by these anti-Constitution Tax Exempt Foundations, corporations, and public officials. We do not want nor will tolerate political agendas in the classroom. And the Bill of Rights will NOT be relinquished for any agenda, including but not limited to Agenda 21.
The Governor knows that Frailey is "covering his backside" says Chantel Wooley, mother of Jordan Wooley, who came forward and told the truth. She saw something, and she said something. The Katy I.S.D. press conference tried to allege that Jordan Wooley lied about what her teacher said. He was immediately corrected by Fox News reporter Andrea Watkins who took apart their lies in short order with evidence she uncovered during her investigation confirming the findings of our investigation. This is a peer reviewed slam dunk. Now all that needs to follow is who is going to represent Jordan and her friends in the lawsuit that surely must follow if for no other reason, to make an example.
