Wednesday, June 17, 2020

COVID-19 a PsyOp? - New Evidence Suggests it’s Been Here Far Longer Than We Know



The Last American Vagabond - an excerpt of his daily rap up. We have decided at RTR to select a few of whom and what we consider the best in the alternative media to deliver the public a full well balanced and fully informed media experience. We have narrowed down our selection in the news reporting and analysis category and emerging at the top of that list is  

RYAN CRISTAN - The Last American Vagabond


The Last American Vagabond was established to allow a free flow of information in regards to current issues that face the American people and the world. The focus being on many such issues that are purposefully and discreetly culled by those who stand to lose, either financially or professionally, due to their relevance. It is TLAV's primary objective to bring these issues to an open forum and or bring about awareness of these topics of paramount importance.

TLAV Goal
The Last American Vagabond will always provide a source of information that the people can trust and count on. It should be openly stated that no journalist can be 100% objective, as it is one's views and opinions that give life to any good writing. Yet, we see it as our moral imperative to not only provide the most up to date, factual information available, but to give you our assessment as to how that information affects you. We will never pass along our opinion as fact, and will never denigrate the truth to suit our agenda, which is all too apparent with the vast majority of corporate media. 

TLAV  Intent
Every dollar that is given will go toward the hiring and paying of a wide range of writers, the acquisition of recording and broadcast equipment, and conducting the most in-depth research and investigative journalism possible; that which quite literally no longer exists in mainstream media. The Last American Vagabond will never take a cent from anyone other than the people, so as to maintain the only obligation that should truly matter: Informing You Of The Truth.

Ryan Cristián
Founder, Editor-in-chief
The Last American Vagabond
WKUP "The Shift"

Tuesday, June 16, 2020

ADL Found Guilty Of Spying By California Court - The YouTube Censors are Unaccountable Foreign Govt Espionage Group

ADL Found Guilty Of Spying
By California Court
By Barbara Ferguson
Arab News Correspondent
4-27-2002
#NeverForget

This is who YouTube has adjusting algorythims and censoring the American people. I am NOT ok with that.
Tom - RTR


WASHINGTON - The San Francisco Superior Court has awarded former Congressman Pete McCloskey, R-California, a $150,000 court judgment against the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).



McCloskey, the attorney in the case, represented one of three civil lawsuits filed in San Francisco against the ADL in 1993. The lawsuit came after raids were made by the San Francisco Police Department and the FBI on offices of the ADL in both San Francisco and Los Angeles, which found that the ADL was engaged in extensive domestic spying operations on a vast number of individuals and institutions around the country.

During the course of the inquiry in San Francisco, the SFPD and FBI determined the ADL had computerized files on nearly 10,000 people across the country, and that more than 75 percent of the information had been illegally obtained from police, FBI files and state drivers, license data banks.

Much of the stolen information had been provided by Tom Gerard of the San Francisco Police Department, who sold, or gave, the information to Ray Bullock, ADL,s top undercover operative.

The investigation also determined that the ADL conduit, Gerard, was also working with the CIA.

Two other similar suits against ADL were settled some years ago, and the ADL was found guilty in both cases, but the McCloskey suit continued to drag through the courts until last month.

In the McCloskey case, the ADL agreed to pay (from its annual multi-million budget) $50,000 to each of the three plaintiffs - Jeffrey Blankfort, Steve Zeltzer and Anne Poirier - who continued to press charges against the ADL, despite a continuing series of judicial roadblocks that forced 14 of the original defendants to withdraw. Another two died during the proceedings.

The ADL, which calls itself a civil rights group, continued to claim it did nothing wrong in monitoring their activities. Although the ADL presents itself as a group that defends the interests of Jews, two of three ADL victims are Jewish.

Blankfort and Zeltzer were targeted by the ADL because they were critical of Israel,s policies toward the Palestinians.

The third ADL victim in the McCloskey case, Poirier, was not involved in any activities related to Israel or the Middle East. Poirier ran a scholarship program for South African exiles who were fighting the apartheid system in South Africa.

At the time, the ADL worked closely with the then anti-apartheid government of South Africa, and ADL,s operative Bullock provided ADL with illegally obtained data on Poirier and her associates to the South African government.

But the conclusion of McCloskey's case does not mean the end to the ADL's legal problems.

On March 31, 2001, US District Judge Edward Nottingham of Denver, Colorado, upheld most of a $10.5 million defamation judgment that a federal jury in Denver had levied against the ADL in April of 2000.

The jury hit the ADL with the massive judgment after finding it had falsely labeled Evergreen, Colorado residents - William and Dorothy Quigley - as "anti-Semites." The ADL is appealing the judgment.
 


Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Sharing content of individuals not members of our team does not mean we agree with or stand behind everything they stand for. We share news, as well as what we believe our readers need to know. Truth is truth, whomever may speak it.

Sunday, June 14, 2020

SEATTLE AUTONOMOUS ZONE of CHAZ - BY FOR and OF the OLIGARCHS - NOT ANTIFA - FULLY EXPOSED

There has been something seriously bothering me as to the nature of the behavior of, and the complaints / demands made by the non-anarchists that the media wants you to believe are anarchists. For one anarchy implies “no rulers” not chaos. And as we see at least one example of an accepted rapper tuned militant overlord patrolling and punishing folks, that isn't exactly a "no rulers" situation. The people there seem as though they are more accurately described nihilists. But any idea that government is not needed (anarchy) is always doomed to be a target of authoritarianism. Not only are these not anarchists as the following stellar presentation from Grace of the ReallyGraceful channel will point out, among their list of demands you will not find any of the following;
- and end to Capitalism
- end to the largest funding of American dollars to the State of Israel while small businesses here go under to be replaced with loans being granted in true Marxist form to “marginalized people”.

- an END to the Federal Reserve 





Well it was no shock to me a glaring issue that Grace points out, that this zone was in fact created and or assisted by members of the Seattle government.   All roads these days seem to connect back to Gates and the Federal Reserves oligarchs. Please feel free to comment here or in the comment section of Grace’s video. And tell her RTR sent ya! 


Monday, June 1, 2020

MARTIAL LAW FORCE YELLS AT FAMILY - GET IN YOUR HOUSE - THEN OPENED FIRE

Who would have ever thought that we would see what looked like military troops ordering people back in their homes. But to fire on the family? In America. Driving down a residential street with no protesters.
  I am shocked. This has got to end. Nothing good can come of this. For the love of God some of those military decked out order followers. I had 2 cops ask me what I was doing out.after curfew. I asked him what law was he enforcing as I didn’t recall but the Governor... yes he said we are following the orders of the gov.I asked them how these duties comports with the Constitution . They couldn’t answer. It’s kind of funny. I could have sworn there was a small issue with illegal detainment was unlawful without due process. How is being ordered into your own home not to come out any different than home confinement or house arrest?  No due process? 




I really never thought I would actually see this happen in America. But it’s happening. And it’s going faster and faster. The ones who are causing all of this insanity are those like the ones below only worse. We caught them being paid to riot!!





And here is Mayor Sniffles who can’t read his prepared statement very well. 



A look back to who Antifa is and who is paying them.



We saw and confirmed video footage yesterday of protesters being paid cash. We will be bringing that report to you soon.





ALL FEDERAL GUN CONTROL LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Unconstitutional
RTR TRUTH MEDIA - LOOKING BACK to LOOK AHEAD :


ALL FEDERAL GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Our friends at the Freedom Outpost wrote and stood expertly on the subject of arms. This is an article from 2015 I believe everyone should read.



Freedom Outpost’s Constitutional scholar Publius Huldah recently explained why Federal gun laws are unlawful. She noted that the first gun control measures put in place in the United States did not take place until 1927, when Congress banned the mailing of certain weapons. We went from 1776 to 1927, 150 years after our founding, when Congress decided, “We better start disarming the American people.”

Huldah goes through the history of the Federal government’s unlawful actions to regulate firearms in America and she points out that when it started, the Progressives had already begun a takeover. I’ll also note the Federal Reserve had been established in 1913 as well.




Congress legislated that gun dealers had to obtain a Federal Firearms Licenses and maintain names and addresses of those they sold their firearms to. She was sarcastic when she asked if we would ask the current President and Congress for “crumbs,” begging them to let us keep “some of our firearms.
She called the letter from the Utah Sheriffs Association “shameful” because it begged Obama not to impose restrictions on firearms by executive order, but rather let Congress determine those However, Huldah said that “We must make a principled resistance. To do that, we must learn the applicable principle.” She then pointed her listeners to the Constitution to see whether or not the Federal government Huldah then pointed out that there is a little known fact about the Constitution

“It is one of enumerated powers only. When “We the people” ordained and established the Constitution, we created the Federal government. It is our creature. We are the creator. It is the creature. It is not our master.”

“The Constitution is so short,” she continued, because all of the powers enumerated to the Federal government are listed in it. “Depending on how you count, we delegated only 21 powers to the Federal government.” Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 1-16 are those powers.

Huldah then courageously pointed out that all laws made by Congress, any restrictions imposed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, any restrictions made by executive order, and all Supreme Court decisions that restrict firearms are unconstitutional. They are unconstitutional because there is no authority to do so.

God is the giver of men’s rights, according to the Declaration of Independence, and the right to defend one’s self and one’s family is not only a right, but it is a duty and responsibility before God, according to the Bible which is a demonstration of our love for others. Therefore, she rightly pointed out that the Second Amendment is not the source of our right. It merely recognizes that the right is to be free from any interference whatsoever to defend ourselves, our families and our communities from attack. “This understanding is as old as human history,” she says.

The Framers of the Constitution understood that arms are the only defense against a Federal government that would seek to overstep its bounds. James Madison, writing in Federalist Paper No. 46, said that the reason the Citizens – the Militia – are armed is to defend ourselves, our families, our neighborhoods, communities, and States from an overreaching, tyrannical federal government.

Here are a couple of things indicate that the Framers of the Constitution understood this idea:

  1. Militia – armed citizens – Second Amendment
  2. Letters of Marque and reprisal – Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11 – This gives authority to Congress to authorize privately owned armed ships to make war on the enemies of the United States. An example of such was during the administration of Thomas Jefferson, where a ship was commissioned to make war on the Barbary pirates via a letter of Marque and reprisal from Congress. Also Congress did the same thing against the British.

In other words, the Framers had no problem with the citizens being as heavily armed as the country’s military. “That is because they did not see themselves as our rulers,” Huldah adds.

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16 gives Congress the authority to demand that able bodied males be armed. It reads:

“To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress.”

In 1792, Congress passed “An Act more effectually to provide for the National Defense by establishing an Uniform Militia throughout the United States.” This Act required all able-bodied male citizens (except for federal officers and employees) between the ages of 18 and under 45 to enroll in their State Militia, get a gun and ammunition, and train.

Publius Huldah then reminds us that the leading cause of death in the 20th Century was Democide – Death by Government. She ran the list of Soviet run Russia, Communist China, Nazi Germany, Cuba, Cambodia, and North Korea. She pointed out that Communist, Fascist and Islamic dictatorships murdered their own people by the tens of millions. “And do not think that isn’t coming this way,” she warned.

Universal registration leads to confiscation. Confiscation leads to extermination. It always has. Why do you think they are so “Hell bent on disarming us?”

James Madison was clear in Federalist 46 that the citizenry being armed is to fight the Federal government’s tyranny. 

“Let’s have no more talk of ‘reasonable restrictions’ and background checks imposed by the Federal government,” Huldah declared.

All Federal government gun and ammunition laws should be nullified, ignored and rendered toothless by the people of the States.

Publius Huldah then reference this essay, “The Coming Day of Burn Barrels and Blessings” in which James Wesley Rawles says:

If congress ever enacts a law mandating the registration and/or a production ban of detachable magazine semiautomatic rifles then you are hereby invited to the town square of your local community. There, burn barrels will be set up and we will publicly burn Form 4473s, FFL Bound Books, state and local registration records, and the sales receipts for every firearm in the United States. On that same day, FFL holders and public officials holding electronic firearms records will simultaneously erase those records, permanently and irretrievably.

Rawles indicates that the use of masks to hide identities would be proper and to cover dealers, they could claim that masked men with guns forced them to do what they did. Simply brilliant!

Huldah then addressed all State and County officers. She called upon them to support their oath, which is to support and defend the U.S. Constitution, according to Article 6, Clause 3. When as a representative of the people you acquiesce to Federal government gun laws of the you are not supporting or defending the Constitution, but rather you are conniving with tyrants against your own people. 

“And if you connive with tyrants against your own people so that you can keep your Federal funding, then shame on you for becoming so corrupt that you allow yourself to be bribed with money that your grandchildren will have to pay back,” Huldah resounded.

She also called upon cowardly representatives who have become corrupt to resign their office and let manly men take their place.

While referencing Tennessee issues later in the speech, she did speak to Federal funding and declare that officials shouldn’t worry about “arming their posse” because manly men will arm themselves!

My fellow Americans, the line was drawn a long time ago and many in our country have allowed the Federal government to creep across that line slowly over the years. It is time to say “Enough is enough,” stop them and then push them back in place where they belong. Seriously, I almost feel like saying, “I’m Tim Brown, and I approved this message.” However, we must resist the tyranny coming from Washington and the tyranny forming at our State and local levels that would seek to restrict our ability to own and carry guns. Thank you Publius Huldah for your stand and may the manly men and the womanly women of this country take that same stand.

Source

HIGH IMPACT VIDEO ALREADY CENSORED - YOU CANT MAKE THIS STUFF UP - GEORGE FL;OYD AND THE OFFICER WHO IS REPORTED TO HAVE KILLED HIM WERE COWORKERS FOR YEARS

 The officer who killed George Floyd worked with him for years at the same club out of all the clubs in Minnesota. And Floyd used to be employed as an actor. An actor in porn, but an actor none-the-less. What are the odds? The officer was reported to be a hot head by other employees. What does all of this mean? I don't know, but what I do know is that the main stream media has not told any of you about this. Also we continue to hear about how black lives matter and are under attack, but really authoritarianism knows no color. We have seen black officers abusing black suspects. Does this mean they are that insanely ridiculous term "self hating"? No, its their training, and their personalities.

The following video report is frpom Brian Young of High Impact Flix

The excerpt below is from AZ Central





EJ Montini: There were no demonstrations after a jury acquitted a former Mesa officer of murdering an unarmed man. Should there have been?


There were no public demonstrations after the verdict in which former Mesa police officer Philip “Mitch” Brailsford was acquitted of murder and reckless manslaughter in the killing of an unarmed man.
Is that because the victim, Daniel Shaver, was white?
Brailsford, also a white man, was answering a call of someone pointing a gun out of a motel window.

Mesa police have released footage from Officer Philip "Mitch" Brailsford's body camera of the fatal shooting of an unarmed Texas man at a hotel in 2016. This edited video shows the moments leading up Daniel Shaver's death. Mesa Police Department
Deputy County Attorney Susie Charbel didn't buy Brailsford's claim that he feared for his life. She told the jury, "(Brailsford) doesn’t get a pass because he was wearing a police uniform that night." 
The jury sided with the officer.
They found Brailsford not guilty.
There has been a lot of interest in the case but nothing inflammatory.
In hindsight two things seem obvious:
Shaver should not be dead.
Brailsford should not have been in that hallway.
I have to question the suitability of an officer whose AR-15 rifle had etched on it the phrase “You’re F***ed.” And I question as well a department that permits him to do so.
The judge didn’t allow that information in the trial, finding it prejudicial.

If he was black, there'd be more noise

There were enough questions about the incident that Brailsford, who was fired by the department, should have been charged. Give Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery credit for allowing a jury to decide. 

If Shaver were a black man the verdict might have been exactly the same. But I'd guess there would have been a lot more noise.

Public demonstrations frighten us. And they can get ugly.
But if Shaver were black I suspect there would be activists talking loudly to the press and demonstrators forcing us to look very closely at policing policies in Mesa and the rest of the Valley, and causing politicians and law enforcement professionals to evaluate the systems they have in place for selecting officers and training them.
That wouldn’t be a bad thing.
MORE FROM MONTINI:
Jeff Flake's 'country over party' ploy is too little, too late

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And what about  :
The death of Samantha Ramsey 
Where were the national protests for Samantha?


occurred on April 26, 2014 at 2:13 am on a Saturday morning at a farm party on the 6600 block on River Road (KY-8) in Hebron, Kentucky, in Boone County, Kentucky. Tyler Brockman, Deputy Sheriff of Boone County, shot four rounds with his Glock 22, hitting her in six spots, including a bullet going through her heart's left ventricle, as she was pulling out of a driveway in her 2001 Subaru away from the farm party, after she allegedly failed to obey  Tyler Brockman's commands to stop. Samantha Ramsey died shortly after, at St. Elizabeth Hospital in Florence, Kentucky. There were three other passengers in the car, who witnessed the shooting


Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.