RTR TRUTH MEDIA AND MANY OTHERS VINDICATED by FAUCI EMAIL EXPOSURE - We Await Apologies from the TECHNOPOLY for DEFAMING AND CENSORING ALL of US

We at RTR Truth Media have been defamed by YouTube and censored by nearly all social media entities when our long standing rules here are to only present something as fact when we have the evidence to back that up, and when we give potential analysis based on our experience and existence of circumstantial evidence we are always clear to say that we are not as of yet convinced lacking the smoking gun. We ALWAYS clarify opinion or fact, yet we have had a video of the Texas State House in session, listed on YouTube as UNLISTED as the claims being made in the video we wanted to seriously fact check. 

WHILE IN THE PROCESS OF FACT CHECKING WE RECEIVED A STRIKE AND THE VIDEO WAS REMOVED BASED ON - GET THIS LIE - A “COMMUNITY GUIDELINES COMPLAINT”  - Would someone like to explain to me how anyone could watch the unlisted video I never gave anyone the link to? 

Would someone also like to explain to me how it was that I downloaded the video from official Texas government operations - a video I downloaded from YouTube?

Well along with being completely vindicated about our position against Dr. “should be tried for serial homicide” Fauci, and about Wuhan and the lab were spot on. 

As we were being shadowbanned and outright censored, penalized and have not been able to upload videos nearly during the entire plannedemic, these Silicone Valley monopolists of media were silencing is and many others, all

I can say is that each and every entity that engaged in said silencing should rightfully be charged as criminal conspirators lending material support to enemies of the united States. 

I will be seriously and deeply considering filing suit against any and all entities that engaged in silencing our voice. And yes, we will in part be arguing 1st Amendment grounds as the infrastructure to the architecture of the internet itself as well as Google, which leads to YouTube, that brazenly accepts massive amounts of cash for political purposes but which clearly has a partisan bias and has demonstrated that the corporation has been and continues to be used as a tool to silence any form of resistance to the Marxist infused political biases it holds. Google is responsible for bringing a subversive destructive ideology forward and normalizing it. Google has engaged with psychological warfare against the American people. They advertised the service as a way and means to “broadcast ourselves” but has no intention of allowing us to do that if our positions run contrary to their “woke vision”. 

NEW YORK TIMES DEALT CRUSHING BLOW and EXPOSED AS INTENTIONAL LYING PROPAGANDISTS

In a stunning blow, New York Times has been taken to the woodshed by Project Veritas and beyond the slinging of words the New York Times was utterly and completely castigated by a judge For doing exactly what they claimed Project Veritas was doing. This video report from James O’Keefe lays it all out with evidence. As many of our readers know, while most of us at RTR TRUTH MEDIA lean to the right, we are not affiliated with any party and our dedication is to the truth no matter where the truth takes us. 

 

As a reminder to anyone and everyone who is not familiar with exactly how the New York Times has been a subversive rag here’s some quotes that should be eye-opening if you haven’t read them already. The following comes from a publication that the CIA regularly has as part of their investigative reports.

Media Protects Bilderberg Group

• Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller and other Bilderberg luminaries frequently and gushingly thank the media attending their secret meetings for covering up their global conspiracy. 

Exclusive to The SPOTLIGHT 
By James P. Tucker Jr. 

Each spring, when Bilderberg meets behind closed doors at a remote luxury resort sealed off by armed guards, police and, frequently, the host nation's military, luminaries from the world's major newspapers and broadcast outlets attend on vows of secrecy. 

Thus, Bilderberg makes the mainstream press part of the conspiracy of silence, causing them to ignore a major story. Over the years, Bilderberg coverage by the SPOTLIGHT has resulted in advance stories on the end of the Cold War, the downfall of Margaret Thatcher and other earth-shaking events. 

Often, the gratitude is expressed individually during cocktail-sippings, with Kissinger, Rockefeller and others thanking Donald Graham, publisher of The Washington Post, and high officials of The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Wall Street Journal and other newspapers and network television anchors. 

But secrecy is so crucial that the collaborating press is often thanked as part of the formal proceedings, too. 

A source who attended the 1991 Bilderberg meeting in Baden Baden, Germany related the following comments to The SPOTLIGHT and attributed them to mattoid David Rockefeller. 

We are grateful to The Washington Post, New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. 

But the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bank ers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries. 

The high-ranking State Department official, who has been a reliable source on Bilderberg for more than a decade, went on to say: "I am unable to confirm those precise words, but I have absolute knowledge that Kissinger, Rockefeller and the others always express their gratitude to the collaborating media, many times as individuals and sometimes during a formal meeting." 

Henry Kissinger reportedly made similar remarks during the Bilder berg meeting in Evian, France in May 1992: 

Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow, they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there is an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge [sic] with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. 

The one thing that every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being by their world government. 

The SPOTLIGHT reported on this meeting on June 8, 1992, saying that Bilderberg was determined on "conditioning the public -- especially 'those stubborn Americans' -- to accept the idea of a UN army that could, by force, impose its will on the internal affairs of any nation."

ADL Found Guilty Of Spying By California Court - The YouTube Censors are Unaccountable Foreign Govt Espionage Group

ADL Found Guilty Of Spying
By California Court

By Barbara Ferguson
Arab News Correspondent
4-27-2002

#NeverForget

This is who YouTube has adjusting algorythims and censoring the American people. I am NOT ok with that.

Tom - RTR

WASHINGTON - The San Francisco Superior Court has awarded former Congressman Pete McCloskey, R-California, a $150,000 court judgment against the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). McCloskey, the attorney in the case, represented one of three civil lawsuits filed in San Francisco against the ADL in 1993. The lawsuit came after raids were made by the San Francisco Police Department and the FBI on offices of the ADL in both San Francisco and Los Angeles, which found that the ADL was engaged in extensive domestic spying operations on a vast number of individuals and institutions around the country. During the course of the inquiry in San Francisco, the SFPD and FBI determined the ADL had computerized files on nearly 10,000 people across the country, and that more than 75 percent of the information had been illegally obtained from police, FBI files and state drivers, license data banks. Much of the stolen information had been provided by Tom Gerard of the San Francisco Police Department, who sold, or gave, the information to Ray Bullock, ADL,s top undercover operative. The investigation also determined that the ADL conduit, Gerard, was also working with the CIA. Two other similar suits against ADL were settled some years ago, and the ADL was found guilty in both cases, but the McCloskey suit continued to drag through the courts until last month. In the McCloskey case, the ADL agreed to pay (from its annual multi-million budget) $50,000 to each of the three plaintiffs - Jeffrey Blankfort, Steve Zeltzer and Anne Poirier - who continued to press charges against the ADL, despite a continuing series of judicial roadblocks that forced 14 of the original defendants to withdraw. Another two died during the proceedings. The ADL, which calls itself a civil rights group, continued to claim it did nothing wrong in monitoring their activities. Although the ADL presents itself as a group that defends the interests of Jews, two of three ADL victims are Jewish. Blankfort and Zeltzer were targeted by the ADL because they were critical of Israel,s policies toward the Palestinians. The third ADL victim in the McCloskey case, Poirier, was not involved in any activities related to Israel or the Middle East. Poirier ran a scholarship program for South African exiles who were fighting the apartheid system in South Africa. At the time, the ADL worked closely with the then anti-apartheid government of South Africa, and ADL,s operative Bullock provided ADL with illegally obtained data on Poirier and her associates to the South African government. But the conclusion of McCloskey's case does not mean the end to the ADL's legal problems. On March 31, 2001, US District Judge Edward Nottingham of Denver, Colorado, upheld most of a $10.5 million defamation judgment that a federal jury in Denver had levied against the ADL in April of 2000. The jury hit the ADL with the massive judgment after finding it had falsely labeled Evergreen, Colorado residents - William and Dorothy Quigley - as "anti-Semites." The ADL is appealing the judgment.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Sharing content of individuals not members of our team does not mean we agree with or stand behind everything they stand for. We share news, as well as what we believe our readers need to know. Truth is truth, whomever may speak it.