Independent media, news reporting, analysis, opinion, forensic historical research presentations. From a Libertarian to Anarcho-Libertarian Anti-Federalist perspective.
RTR TRUTH MEDIA - Johnny Gat of Vigilante Intelligence exposes some uncomfortable facts . The following is his presentation with evidence to back his assertions.
This includes a preview of an expose on Assange I may do in the future
which will include debunking the Seth Rich conspiracy theory. Anyone who
is well informed on the Talpiot program knows that Israeli companies
are spying on the world and stealing technology. Russians work in a lot
of those tech firms and those secrets are making their way to Putin.
Assange's tweet I featured shows that he is deflecting blame and is
benefiting Israel and Russia greatly.
Also briefly exposing Julian Assange & Patrick Henningsen.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
I have long pointed out the hypocritical policies of YouTube, but in comparison to the latest insanity in Silicon Valley, that was nothing compared to this. An unlisted, uncirculated video that contained no commentary by the uploader and just some stock 911 footage and music. The video was deemed by Google, (YouTube) to be "hate speech".
Question: How does one flag a video, be offended by it, or otherwise have reason to complain... WHEN THE VIDEO IS NOT EVEN IN VIEWABLE CIRCULATION? When the video is not even public? Even by most Marxists' definition of "hate speech", as unAmerican and Bolshevik style in nature that this thought police concept is, the uploaded video comes nowhere near violating even that insane concept definition in reality, and in fact, it defames the content creator. YES. I am referring to myself. They terminated my main channel with years of work and after creating a marketable audience (even though claiming my material was not marketable) but I had a few other channels for a variety of different purposes. I never intended on using them as a way to beat censorship when they were created. This latest wae of censorship must be met with litigation and prosecution. It is called defamation and is economic terrorism via the targeting of political ideology.
This is the same Googler that at least as if they are not still, taking military contract work paid for by taxpayers. I don't know if they are aware of it or not but after working for a private company that installed bullet and blast-proof glass at Federal courthouses and military bases, I can tell you that the company I worked for had to comply with certain guidelines regarding rights. I believe the time has come to fight back. This absolutely ridiculously blatant act comes after one other was set to expire. I did an interview with Wolfgang Halbig of Sandy Hook and Alex Jone's fame. We discussed nothing about the kids or the event of Sandy Hook, in fact, I really had him on to talk about the suit against he and Alex Jones as well as the fact that it was he who alleged that he sold the school Emergency plan to Marjory Stoneman Douglass High and more in Broward County. That is called NEWS. I never disparaged anyone. I never bullied anyone or advocated for anyone to bother anyone else. Yet in a blatant and total lie that is exactly what YouTube accused me of. I for one and sick of this corporation bullying folk who have a different outlook than they do. Because at best, that is 3xactly what they have become. BULLIES and ECONOMIC TERRORISTS. Those of us who have built our channels before they decided to go nuts should not have what equates to our own homegrown businesses destroyed by social engineering corporations.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
I have long been a supporter of "Constitutional Sheriffs". That being said the truth is that most all of them are still under the effects of mass mind control of authoritarianism and conditioning. The Soviet term for this is called "active measures"/ and while the Soviet Union and World Communist Movement have had a large effect on domestic policies, it truly began here from the agents of the Crown on down to corrupt power hungry political parasites. I am also in full agreement with Brian Young on this issue. As you will see in the video the good Sheriff has finally realized that unconstitutional laws are passed. The only problem is that it took the extreme case scenario of guns to wake him from his slumber. Truth be told the Federal as well as state governments have since at least the War of Northern Aggression (Civil War) been enacting and enforcing UN Constitutional laws. Having to get "permission" as well as be subject to having permission revoked for traveling, fishing, hunting, how you keep your yard or the speech you stand upon to express yourself... i.e. "hate laws". We have traveled down so many slippery slopes that its hard to tell if any government ever got it right consistently. Sure there are pockets of America such as Athens Tennessee that saw veterans arming themselves to protect an election from a corrupt Sheriff. They surrounded the Sheriffs Office and filled it full of lead until they surrendered the ballot box. Today we see creeping ommunitarianism, collectivism, and the fusion of corporate fascism and communism. The only "ism" we are supposed to have is "individualism", the greatest minority is that of one.
No victim... no crime.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
"We believe a timely, concerted effort on the part of these three agencies [DOE, FBI, CIA] would have greatly aided and possibly solved the NUMEC diversion questions, if they desired to do so."
Documents
In 1977 chair of the House of Representatives subcommittee on Energy and PowerJohn D. Dingellrequested an investigation to determine whether weapons grade uranium had been illegally diverted from the US into a clandestine Israeli nuclear weapons program.
In the early 1960s, the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) began documenting suspicious lapses in security at the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) in Pennsylvania. In 1965 an Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) audit found that NUMEC could no longer account for 220 pounds of highly enriched uranium. The amount of missing uranium could "make at least four or five nuclear weapons" according to the report.In 1966 the FBI opened an investigation code-named DIVERT and began monitoring NUMEC's management and large numbers of Israeli visitors. On Sept. 10, 1968, four Israelis visited NUMEC's president to "discuss thermoelectric devices with [Zalman] Shapiro," according to correspondence from NUMEC's security manager seeking official AEC consent for an Israeli visit. Among the approved visitors was Rafael Eitan. After Eitan's visit, 587 pounds of highly enriched uranium was classified as missing.
The GAO investigation was chartered to discover whether:
1. "The material was illegally diverted to Israel by NUMEC management for use in nuclear weapons."
2. "The material was diverted to Israel by NUMEC management with the assistance of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)."
3. "The material was diverted to Israel with the acquiescence of the United States Government."
4. GAO inquired whether "there has been a cover-up of the NUMEC incident by the United States Government."
The GAO officially concluded that the federal efforts to resolve the matter were "less than adequate." GAO charged the FBI "which had the responsibility and authority to investigate the alleged incident, did not focus on the question of a possible nuclear diversion until May 1976, nearly 11 years later." The GAO found other serious lapses in the FBI investigation. "GAO found that certain key individuals had not been contacted by the FBI almost 2 years into the FBI's current investigation."
Internal CIA memo on publicly releasing equity in GAO report. CIA Deputy Director for Operations:
"Advise GAO that we cannot declassify our report because of the need to have a coordinated Executive Branch position and our desire to protect a sensitive and valuable liaison equity."
Nuclear Diversion in the U.S.? 13 Years of Contradiction and Confusion. - Redacted version released by the ISCAP on On March 18, 2014 with more CIA equity content. (Release Letter)
* An earlier GAO report titled "Review of Accountability Controls Over Special Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation," Report to Joint Committee on Atomic Energy by the Comptroller General of the United States, June 1967 may be viewed in the NUMEC archive.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
As usual Aaron and Melissa Dykes do not disappoint. Their depth of research is often chilling and seems fantastic, even not possible. But research these topics for yourself and you will see that all of their presentations are spot on. Fabian Socialism much like Communitarianism is not spoken about nearly enough. Through gradualism they strike slow but hard. Fabian Socialists such as George Bernard Shaw thought the culling of individuals not performing or producing was something that should be reviewed in everyone's lives every 7 to 8 years or so when you go before a state board that decides to keep you alive or not. No I am NOT joking. Listen for yourself. further below you will find Nancy Pelosi quoting Shaw and Shaw's words spoken from his own mouth.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
The Last American Vagabond - The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, from the last 24 hours.
The Last American Vagabond with Tom Lacovara-Stewart of RTR Truth Media
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
In the following video you will here MSM news reorts that includes terms such as “your 2nd Amendment rights” and not at all ever mentioning that the Office of Sheriff exists in large part to be part of the “check and balance” system. They were never supposed to be used as they are now. And many of them. They were supposed to be “peace officers” not policy enforcers or revenue generation Bolsheviks.
What ever happened to Trump saying...
If I become President you’d be in jail Hillary?
He played us.
Listen to Brian Young break down the “cult of the state.
If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing to the High Impact Vlogs channel as well as the High Impact Flix channel.
I love all of you who stand in opposition to tyranny.
The 2nd Amendment DOES NOT GIVE OR GRANT RIGHTS. It is a restriction on government that we are told “we the people” created. I don’t recall ever consenting to any of the last Presidents from Bush to Clinton. Obama to Trump.
When will we stop and let it sink in that all government is comprised of is a rights destroying mind control pushing cult. A cult of personality.
His motto was “Make America Great Again” but all he has done is to make Israel seriously bold, and on the way to war with Iran thus delivering what Bush couldn’t and what the NeoCons have long sought on behalf of Israel.
#NoMoreWars4Israel
#BoycottIsrael
#ExposeUnit8200 #KingGad#IsraelSpiesOnAmerica
#IsraelDid911 #LavonAffair
I used to see Anarchy as something bad. I was a victim of the propaganda. All Anarchy means is NO RULERS. It means that we do not wish to be ruled. It doesn’t mean chaos and no rules. It doesn’t mean “do what thou wilt
