Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts

Thursday, July 16, 2020

COMPLETE IGNORANCE of CONSTITUTION by JUDICIAL ACTIVIST and MARXIST PROSECUTOR SEES INNOCENT COUPLE VIOLATED 1st BY BLM then by GOVT -



In a disgusting display and abuse of power the couple that defended their home after their rights had clearly been violated, their lives under threat after rioters broke down their gate and threatened to kill their dog, have had their guns confiscated. No charges, as of yet, but the insane Communists that serve in government there have violated their oaths and need be arrested immediately. The judge who issued the search warrant has acted in bad behavior and should be immediately stripped of their authority, and should also be arrested. If the state does not act the Justice Dept. has a sworn responsibility. 

RTR

IF THE GOVT FAILS TO RIGHT THIS - MILITIA IS THE ONLY OTHER OPTION. 

The Constitution is not complicated. 
For a reason. 

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

SHERIFF DENIES ENFORCEMENT of UNCONSTITUTIONAL GUN CONTROL MEASURES - What about the rest of the Constitution?




I have long been a supporter of "Constitutional Sheriffs".  That being said the truth is that most all of them are still under the effects of mass mind control of authoritarianism and conditioning. The Soviet term for this is called "active measures"/ and while the Soviet Union and World Communist Movement have had a large effect on domestic policies, it truly began here from the agents of the Crown on down to corrupt power hungry political parasites. I am also in full agreement with Brian Young on this issue. As you will see in the video the good Sheriff has finally realized that unconstitutional laws are passed. The only problem is that it took the extreme case scenario of guns to wake him from his slumber. Truth be told the Federal as well as state governments have since at least the War of Northern Aggression (Civil War) been enacting and enforcing UN Constitutional laws. Having to get "permission" as well as be subject to having permission revoked for traveling, fishing, hunting, how you keep your yard or the speech you stand upon to express yourself... i.e. "hate laws". We have traveled down so many slippery slopes that its hard to tell if any government ever got it right consistently. Sure there are pockets of America such as Athens Tennessee that saw veterans arming themselves to protect an election from a corrupt Sheriff. They surrounded the Sheriffs Office and filled it full of lead until they surrendered the ballot box.  Today we see creeping ommunitarianism, collectivism, and the fusion of corporate fascism and communism. The only "ism" we are supposed to have is "individualism", the greatest minority is that of one.



No victim... no crime.












Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Monday, January 6, 2020

VIRGINIA TYRANNY RISES WHILE the MAIN STREAM MEDIA CONTINUES to LIE ABOUT IT

In the following video you will here MSM news reorts that includes terms such as “your 2nd Amendment rights” and not at all ever mentioning that the Office of Sheriff exists in large part to be part of the “check and balance” system. They were never supposed to be used as they are now. And many of them. They were supposed to be “peace officers” not policy enforcers or revenue generation Bolsheviks. 

What ever happened to Trump saying...
If I become President you’d be in jail Hillary?
He played us. 

Listen to Brian Young break down the “cult of the state.




If you appreciate our work, please consider subscribing to the High Impact Vlogs channel as well as the High Impact Flix channel.

I love all of you who stand in opposition to tyranny. 

The 2nd Amendment DOES NOT GIVE OR GRANT RIGHTS. It is a restriction on government that we are told “we the people” created.  I don’t recall ever consenting to any of the last Presidents from Bush to Clinton. Obama to Trump.

When will we stop and let it sink in that all government is comprised of is a rights destroying mind control pushing cult. A cult of personality. 

His motto was “Make America Great Again” but all he has done is to make Israel seriously bold, and on the way to war with Iran thus delivering what Bush couldn’t and what the NeoCons have long sought on behalf of Israel. 

#NoMoreWars4Israel
#BoycottIsrael 
#ExposeUnit8200 #KingGad#IsraelSpiesOnAmerica


















Tom Lacovara-Stewart - Chris Switzer


#IsraelDid911 #LavonAffair 

I used to see Anarchy as something bad. I was a victim of the propaganda. All Anarchy means is NO RULERS. It means that we do not wish to be ruled. It doesn’t mean chaos and no rules. It doesn’t mean “do what thou wilt

Friday, December 27, 2019

IT APPEARS VIRGINIA POLITICIANS ARE OPENLY DEFYING the CONSTITUTION & THEIR OWN PEOPLE

Some people will never learn. I had a few listeners of our radio show call and ask me, how can Virginia politicians engage in outright treason... my answer was short and sweet.





 We were overthrown in 1868. Not by the South. Not by the North either, but through subversion. The concept of the Republic at that point was in a spiral. They had to maintain the illusion of normalcy so the progression toward their goal would not be resisted. 11 states were forced out at gunpoint of the vote for ratification of the 14th Amendment which made the validity of the “public debt” unquestionable. Think about that. We have a right to give redress of grievances... or so I was lead to believe.  Some northern states withdrew their votes when they realized they were being played.  One state had their reps kidnapped and by force made to take their seat so that a quorum would be made so a vote could be taken. Not exactly a “honorable lawful process”. 

Many are dumbfounded as to how these Virginia politicians can be even considering what they are doing. Try taking a hard stand before we are lost and have had our claws and teeth pulled.  Below is a stellar presentation with an announcement from Brian Young at High Impact Flix. He is headed to Virginia and DC to cover this. If I were 15 years younger I would be on my way to defend it. 

Those Virginia politicians are treasonous cowards. But Trump won’t do a damn thing but blow hot air. The Presidency has been a puppet post for a long time. Trump is always talking about the necessity of bi- partisan cooperation. Has anyone not realized that the left right paradigm is a bunch of garbage yet ?

Trump backs Bolshevik style Red Flag laws. 
In fact he said he would like to “take the guns first and worry about due process later”. His rationale was allegedly based on the alleged actions of the parkland suspect. Nicholas Cruz. The only problem with that is that both Federal and local law enforcement had the ways and means to have dealt with him long before the shooting occurred.  Not that there wasn’t already huge issues with that event. 

It was an Obama Marxist Grant program that existed to reduce the stats of “marginalized students” that’s Marxist language for Black, Hispanic etc. What could go wrong? Law enforcement agencies including Miami Dade and it appears Broward were just not arresting them, the stats would go down, and they would get the money. Government created the problem to then offer a false solution. GUN CONTROL. 

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

It was crystal clear then... and it’s just as clear now.
They are coming. The rough times are just over the next hill so to speak.



Our right to bear arms does not, nor did it ever come from government. The founders of the American republic made that clear. So I ask you... if legitimate government, rather an oxy-moron, but if it never had a power to do so, then what does that make many of the corporations acting as an “authority” are by al evidence illegitimate - defacto. 

The 14th Amendment which was never lawfully ratified even according to their own terms.  It created a new citizenship, it killed states rights, and even individual rights. It created essentially a Communist form of citizenship. And ever since we have increasingly needed government permission to do anything. That is NOT freedom. That is tyranny. And when one realizes that the root words that comprise the word government is as defined “mind control”, well then it all makes rather obvious sense. 




Friday, September 27, 2019

TEEN EXPELLED FROM SCHOOL for GOING to SHOOTING RANGE with HIS MOTHER - EVERYONE INVOLVED SHOULD BE FIRED



It would seem that a lot of people in America have collectively lost their minds. This school is a government run institution. When government violates the rights of an individual harsh consequences should follow. Schools allowed to violate the Supreme Law of the Land and allowed to get away with it show exactly how they are being used as social change agent facilitators.

Justine [Myers] woke up to a voicemail from Thompson Valley School District where Nate is a junior at Loveland High School in Loveland, CO. The voicemail informed Justine that a report had come in claiming Nate was a threat to the school and he was not allowed to return until further notice. The report presumably came through Safe 2 Tell.

There are reports that a school wide email was also sent to parents about the “threat”. Justine immediately contacted the school assuming she could easily clear things up, especially since the police had already assessed the situation and realized no one had done anything wrong or made any threats. She was wrong.

The school not only refused to provide her with more information about the “threat”, but they refused to provide Nate with schoolwork so he doesn’t get behind. A “threat assessment hearing” has been scheduled for Thursday morning at 10am at the school admin building where Justine will be allowed to defend her son against SEVEN school officials who will be in attendance to, as she was told, “make their case”.

Make their case of what? That Nate’s outing with his mother to train with her firearms somehow makes him a danger to the school?

TSD Superintendent Marc Schaffer notified the parents of Nathan Myers that he could not return to school until the district completed a full investigation after Nathan posted a Snapchat video on Tuesday of several handguns and an AR-15 belonging to his mother.

The guns were being packed for a family shooting trip to the mountains, the boy’s mother, Justine Myers, said. Nathan posted the video with the caption “Finna be lit,” which is slang for “gonna be exciting.”

Someone called the anonymous line “Safe2Tell,” and reported they feared Nathan was threatening the school. “Safe2Tell” is designed for youth to be able to give tips to their school and police about threatening situations. However, Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams said the line has been dubbed “Safe2Swat,” by kids who use the line for both practical jokes and to get even with other students they may have a conflict with.

Swatting is a term that is used when someone deceptively sends police and other emergency services to another person’s address through false reporting of an emergency or criminal action.

Nathan’s father had left several messages for Justine about police officers at his home questioning Nathan’s intentions while they were out of cell phone coverage.

“His father told them (Tuesday evening that) he was out shooting with me. I am an avid shooter,” Justine said. “So, the officers said he wasn’t in trouble and left.”



Despite being glad the situation is resolved, Justine said she is still frustrated at how it was handled. She said it felt like they were downplaying the severity of the situation, including failing to allow the boy access to his homework. The school district told Justine they did not get clearance from the police until sometime Wednesday,

“You expect me to believe they had a threat on a school and the school waited more than 15 hours to contact the police to find out if it was credible,” Justine said.

Nathan and his parents met with school district officials for what she said amounted to 5 minutes before they gave Nathan permission to return to class and promised him there would be no consequences surrounding the issue.

“We walked in, they gave him a big envelope with his homework in it and immediately apologized,” Justine said. “They told him he was a good kid, they liked him, and they never believed he was making a threat against the school, but that ‘you know we have to do this.’ ”

Saturday, September 14, 2019

WATCH BETO O’ROURKE COMMIT OPEN TREASON ACCORDING TO the ORIGINAL INTENT of NATURAL RIGHTS PROTECTED by the 2nd Amendment



The misinformation I hear most from both sides of the right left false political paradigm both right and left, is discussion of what many call “our 2nd Amendment Rights”. I am here to inform you, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHTS! 

LISTEN TO THE LATEST EPISODE of RTR Truth Media’s Resurrect the Republic Radio Show on the Republic Broadcasting Network by clicking - 
RTR Radio w/ Tom Lacovara-Stewart, Chris Switzer and Rachel Tobias



The right to keep and bear arms, is an inherent right. This is a natural right, and one our founders declared was one that pre-existed the creation or the authority of any legitimate Republic or government that claims to exist to preserve individual liberty. Our Founders reversed  Monarchial sovereignty. Sovereignty was vested within the individual. Prior to the founding of our states, the King of England was considered the “sovereign”.  Each state, it’s own nation, retained authority granted to it by its people, and in a confederation all sovereign states agreed to enter into a union to provide for the common defense of America from any nation that would attempt to rise above any individual state within, or against all together. This was an arrangement that provided for mutual defense. It provided for the protection of our borders. But where the propagandists often try and indoctrinate new generations is that of the authority of government itself in relation to and even in the understanding of the 2nd Amendment. 

We will hear them call the right to keep and bear arms “2nd Amendment Rights” because of a long standing agenda to make people believe that the government created and thus granted to the public this right. If that were so, it would not have ever been called a right in 1789, but a privilege. This is something that most people do not know about “rights” 

NO LEGITIMATE FREE COUNTRY GRANTS NATURAL RIGHTS
NATURAL RIGHTS EXIST BY THE GRACE of GOD
or if you prefer, that which is retained via our very humanity. 


The people together as sovereigns had no more authority collectively to alter, abolish or change these inherent rights than the government. So again, while these politicians continue to try and raise numbers and use false statistics to claim that the “majority” of people want this or that, the real deception, often spoken directly is that the united States is a democracy, which would be essentially mob rule. It is not rightfully any such thing. It is a democratically elected Constitutional Republic with the base Supreme Law being the Constitution with the Bill of Rights. The difference is stark. No matter what the public can be duped into believing, no matter what they can be convinced should be demanded, any action MUST comport with the Constitution first and foremost. And if it does not it is a dead issue. We are constantly lied to about the American “democracy”. This has been and continues to be a primary goal of the world Communist movement. This is what many Socialists on both the right and left want you to believe we have, and let me assure you the ones on the right are even more dangerous than those on the left because they present themselves as being opposed to these socialistic / communistic policies. But if you look very closely and apply the same criteria you would to Communists, you will see that NeoConservatism especially is for corporate welfare, and foreign redistribution of wealth. This redistribution however funds foreign nations and globalism. It also funds the overthrow of foreign governments via terrorist and revolutionary fronts.  We have seen this in Iraq, Libya, and remember the Contras? 

The reason I bring this all up when discussing the subversion that has gone on in relation to redefining long understood Constitutional tenets, is because many can not see those within their own flavor of political ideology who have been engaged in this. Both parties have moved to increasing authoritarian measures, and they have done so with the help of the people who for the most part are oblivious. 

Here is an example of this hypocrisy at work.

One of the oldest and most traditional aspects of Constitutional Conservatism is private property rights, and as small a central government as possible which does not interfere with individuals right to enjoy said property. 

So now look at Palestine. Most conservatives have been programmed to stand with Israel. We are told that the founding of this corporate state that chose to name itself after the Biblical entire 12 tribes that are descendents of Abraham, the principal figure whose God is the one true God of the universe, the Creator of all is the fulfillment of Biblical prophesy. But it is only that of those of a very certain religion, ignoring an entire New Testament. This has lead to conservatives not only condoning, but funding and supporting the theft of private property, and the violation of human rights that has even been made clear by breaking international law agreed to by the majority of civilized nations. This support that has stolen and also continues to steal private property from Palestinian Christians as well. How can Christians who purport to stand by the Supreme Law of their God, as well as the fundamentals of the preservation and protection of individual private property rights, depart from all of which their religion and their purported political ideological views stand upon? When one sees the subversion by placing it next to its own traditions, while assessing what it purports to stand for comparing it to what it has rejected how can anyone who claims to be a conservative accept this? 

      Do you see? That is how subversion is accomplished. By indoctrination, and call to emotion, one small slip at a time we have been trained to violate everything that we were supposed to stand for. And the endgame rests upon the armed public. Make no mistake. The tyrant gun grabbers are here, they are bold, and they are unafraid as We The People have continuously failed to do all tbat was necessary to keep government in check. Now we have agencies of government calling the planning of doing so “domestic terrorism”. 

Our right to take up arms, even against the government if need be is such a well understood right and according to the Declaration of Independence it is even more than that. It is our duty. They are, and have been indoctrinating the public to believe that doing all of the things necessary to prevent a criminal government is in itself criminal. 

LISTEN to RTR Radio on the Republic Broadcasting Network 



You know, it’s rather funny but in a way not, that lately any seeming political baseless witch hunt is compared to Senator Joe McCarthy’s attempt to root out Communists in America to avoid much of what we are seeing now. Personally there are a few things I would personally have done differently. For one, I would have approached the situation with a public presentation that showed how many of those who have been indoctrinated by Marxism / Communism, etc, are in fact victims of what is known as “active measures” which is a style of psychological manipulation also referred to as “ideological subversion”.  I would have made it clear that the public must be made to understand that this is in every way a form of mind control which the Soviet Union focused on above all else. The collapse of the Soviet Union was not a victory for anyone or anything but world Communism itself. People are conditioned to view the world with the lens of nation states, black and white, win or lose. This is a seriously oversimplified way to see the world. The Soviet Union reformed because the mission it set out to do had been accomplished. Communism had successfully been rebranded and spread all over the West, and especially the United States, and it had seen the creation of a state dead center of the old Silk Road, and via an assumed identity that gave its agents more cover and protection than any other Marxist collective had ever achieved. The smear homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, etc was NOTHING compared to the label called “antisemitism”. The world Communist Movement through the Soviet Union has achieved the most brilliant accomplishment that anyone could have ever imagined. As 80% of those who identified as Jewish flooding into Palestine were in fact Bolshevik Communists. The CIA knew this. The Arabs were screaming for help and trying to tell people that they were being invaded by Communists and President Truman, being fully informed of these facts deliberately withheld this information from the public , less they might begin attacking all Jews everywhere. Part of the brilliance of this use of Jewish identity was the use of Holocaust sympathy combined with a global public relations campaign that would have anyone who criticized Jews, regardless of the validity or danger of the claim, and torpedoed the truth with this Marxist propaganda that destroys 1st Amendment protections. Along with comparing anyone engaged in said criticism with Hitler and the Gestapo. All the while a very real gestapo/STASI was being planned to be implemented in the US. It is known as the US Department of Homeland Security. Not only can it be compared to the STASI, but Bolshevik NeoCon Zionist Micheal Chertoff  employed Marcus Wolfe the former head of the Soviet East German STASI and others to consult in the creation of the DHS. This should at this point, solidly have your attention.    

Sharing the truth of this information directly places my life at risk. This is no exaggeration. Just today I revived a text message from someone within the state that I live. A number I do not know assigned to a cell phone of someone who had no clue about the message that not only informed me that they knew specific very personal information regarding my current routine, but that they “were coming for me”.


Now I know that the information I share with all of you is the truth, but apparently I have some folks seriously worried about it. I never personally attack or threaten anyone. I have no actual personal “enemies” in daily life. There is only one probable explanation for such a threat by someone who has specific detailed intimate knowledge of my life. And that is :
EXPOSING THE CRIMES, and the CRIMINALS behind them. 

There was no way for anyone who is not a part of my daily life to know that not only did I retrieve my Harley Davidson, (something many people know) but that I have not had it out for a ride in the 2 months it has been with me here. No one could have known that detail but someone who has been close enough to be engaged in surveillance of my home. I take this threat far more serious because of my wife and the good friends who live in a separate house on the property here. Response time for the Sheriff’s Dept would be beneficial to take a report and collect the bodies. And since the Federal Government sees me as some kind of right wing domestic terror threat (who has stopped 3 robberies, saved lives as a firefighter for years and who has never harmed anyone - ever) and they have seen fit to issue a cruel and unusual punishment for life. A life sentence of being a second class citizen, whose life is of lesser value than those the state has not deemed equivalent to others. While the government continues to pass laws granting collectivist groups special rights and privileges, my natural God given rights have been curtailed. As I sit in the desert on my porch, watching the glow of the moon, I ask myself... “self”, (as I am now talking to no one but me) self, does any corporation, body politic, collective, presumed alleged authority, or any political parasites have the authority to make a law that nullifies one’s ability to perform a duty one owes to the Republic? When one is directly engaged in a mission to accomplish what the Declaration of Independence provides for as remedy to a corrupt entity we call our government? 
And furthermore, as a member of the press, and needing one’s life to be able to accomplish the task of publishing information, does not the 1st Amendment directly apply? 
Think about it. 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

So let us for a moment consider what free exercise means, beginning with the definition of “freedom” itself.

freedom

 noun
free·​dom |  \ ˈfrē-dəm   \

Definition of freedom

1: the quality or state of being free: such as
athe absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action
bliberation from slavery or restraint or from the power of another INDEPENDENCE
cthe quality or state of being exemptor released usually from something onerous freedom from care
dunrestricted use gave him the freedom of their home
eEASEFACILITYspoke the language with freedom
fthe quality of being frank, open, or outspoken answered with freedom
gimproper familiarity
hboldness of conception or execution
2aa political right



So, if someone is threatening the life, safety or well being of  a member of the press, and as a result that of his family, I would consider that coercion to force silence, as well as retribution for producing, publishing and expressing news, analysis, truth and facts. And according to the 1st Amendment Congress is not permitted to write or enforce a law that would abridge it. 

The moment this individual threatened my life, he altered the  nature of my work. Without the ability to adequately defend myself, I would need to cease my work, and relocate to an undisclosed location. The relocation would be no guarantee as I am obviously being surveilled. Without any idea of whom is doing so, with the amount of property and with a camper trailer in tow, it is highly unlikely that I would be able to relocate while also eluding someone attempting to tail me.

Furthermore, as we all know the Supreme Court of the united States has repeatedly ruled that corporate law enforcement (the police) have absolutely NO DUTY and NO OBLIGATION to protect any of us non governmental personnel unless we are in their legal custody. Their duty according to SCOTUS is to protect the corporation and the assets and representatives of the corporation A.K.A. The US, and any and all subsidiaries and to enforce “the law”. Amazing that out of all the so called “Acts of Congress” not one of them ever introduced the “Duty to Protect Act”. We have seen the result of this in Parkland Florida. And while the government claims that the police need “more tools” to accomplish protecting the public which is not their job, the one law that could likely vastly improve this problem, the fact is that if government foot soldiers have no duty to protect us, then that responsibility falls upon us. 

So while under normal circumstances I would be able to protect myself, circumstances have changed. There is a direct threat upon my life now as a member of the press. 
I can not afford armed security.
    And no law shall be made or to be held valid to abridge the freedom of the press. Therefore any law, rule, policy, or mandate that prevents me from protecting my ability to do my job, one being the ability to breathe, another the ability to accomplish my tasks without the fear and intimidation or coercion, is null and void, not applicable under the current circumstances. 

So I have a question for the individual or group who chose to level that threat against me. 

How do you think I interpret the Constitution regarding my right to keep and bare arms to protect the free exercise of “the press”?    Nothing will stop me from performing my duties as a representative of the free press. 

In my life, I have never harmed another individual, nor do I intend to start now. I disagree with a lot of people. That does not mean that I believe I have any right to forcefully prevent them from expressing themselves or in any way violate their unalienable rights. Of course this does not include actions that directly threaten the rights or lives of others.