Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 28, 2022

The FBI - Inexcusable , Unconstitutional Law Breaking American STASI

I've been for a very long time trying to inform my audience of the obvious. From the Federal Bureau of Investigation to the Department of Homeland Security, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, to the Bureau of Land Management, we have allowed slowly year after year, tragedy after tragedy, the excuse of increased needed security to be used to justify the erosion of rights and our freedom. This is Ron Pauls take on it. I agree with him.

RTR Truth Media

Sunday, August 25, 2019

#KidsLives4Cash - NOT - #March4OurLives - More Evidence Parkland Superintendent and School Board Lied About Cruz Being in the Promise Federal Grant Program

FULL FOLLOW THE 54 MILLION in PARKLAND PROMISE GRANT MONEY
to reduce crime stats video
BELOW

Today on RTR Truth Media LIVE

Resurrect The Republic Dirty Uncle Sam - High Impact Coalition

On Today's Show we will be discussing Representative Crenshaw and an interview that was recorded by Joseph Walker AKA on other social media platforms as Johnny Furbashar. The discussion was about Red Flag Law Legislation, some details, etc. We will have a video copy of the interview uploaded here some time this afternoon. All you have to do if you don't feel like checking back is to subscribe to our
RTR Truth Media YouTube Channel
or our
RTR Truth Media Bitchute Channel

ARCHIVES of TODAY'S SHOW
Will be placed in the Facebook message, in our video description, in this article and in our Spreaker Podcast that you can also go and sub to RTR TruthMedia Spreaker Podcast

PARKLAND SCHOOL SHOOTING ON SUPERINTENDENT and SHERIFF

---------------------------------------------------------------------

#KidsLives4Cash - Parkland Shooting - Following the Money

Superintendent - The Heat of Inaction - Why did Cruz Slip Through the Cracks? He didn’t.
Had to reduce those arrest statistics to keep the Federal Grant Program money rolling in.
Nicolas Cruz had serious problems. There is a documentary I will be posting at the bottom. It is interesting.

CLIP #1

CLIP #2
Superintendent Runcie Caught Lying About Cruz & the Promise Grant Program

CLIP #3
Nikolas Cruz - Revealed to “Have Been In the Promise Grant Program - Runcie Caught in the Lie!

Runcie and the School Board Both Caught in the Lie!

The truth... Cruz was not arrested for (in my opinion) 2 major reasons.

1 - The actual intentional and in all probability very intentionally, Nikolas Crus was not arrested when in fact the SRO’s has more than enough justification to intervene.

2 - He could have either been brought back into the program by actually “being proactive”, Or, of course what is far more likely, that there were instructions as we hear in the video “not to arrest him”. This can also be for 2 different or combined possibilities.

- He was a “targeted individual”. He clearly “heard voices”, and not only governments get into this activity. Along with intelligence agencies also private corporations, ideologues, perhaps corporate structure much like the SPLC, or any hard core cult like believing anti-gun group, or coordinated effort, these operations have long taken place. Denying this is to deny reality itself.

I’m not accusing. But with what we know for fact in the past about that history, it is more than a reasonable consideration. Some may call it “Conspiracy Theory” all they like. I have hard evidence of the things I That I articulate my ponderings. And I want people to understand, I make no solid “this is it” theory, unless I have an overwhelming amount of evidence to present.

He was compliant, and shows signs and symptoms of psychological manipulation trauma. I would be willing to bet they also did not test his blood for some common but slightly exotic mind control drugs. The Devil’s Breath comes to mind. What I am putting forward is perfectly scientifically reasonably possible. Drugs like concentrated Scopolomine from a tree in South America has flowers that grow on it. Concentrated they make the intoxicated extremely suggestive. Some people become total slaves to a handler. But all inhibition is completely removed. And this is just one such drug. There are literally dozens known to those in spycraft, governmental or corporate espionage, and Black Ops. There is a serious agenda being pushed hard out there. What a better way than to pave the way with “it bleeds it leads”, and complete ignorance as to the fraud being comitted when millions of dollars are flowing just from one Grant program alone. There are quotes about this planned process of subversion of the U.S Constitution, of the ruin of Individual Natural Rights for that of collectivism.

Communitarianism.

RTR TRUTH MEDIA Additional Links -

Historical Quotes, Analysis, Background - #KidsLives4Cash - FLORIDA SHOOTING - CORRUPT GRANT PROGRAM SEES MASSIVE COVER UP of INTENTIONAL SUPPRESSION of CRIME STATS to GET MORE FEDERAL MONEY - Police Told Not to Arrest

Plain Link - KIDS LIVES FOR FEDERAL CASH - FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL SHOOTING - CATASTROPHIC FAILURE BY DESIGN

ASHLIE #1

Dana Ashlie explains how the government targets individuals (TI or Targeted Individuals) with "energy weapons" (think this could be related to MK-Ultra?), basically tormenting them and causing them to hear voices in their heads by transmitting spoken sentences into their minds. The interesting thing is, nearly every mass shooter reported of hearing voices in their heads including Nik Cruz so Dana speculated the government is heavily involved and how this is related to Project Bluebeam which will basically fake the Second Coming. it's also interesting to note that many TIs who heard voices in their minds were misdiagnosed as schizophrenic and I remember reading about one article about this shooter in Florida who was diagnosed as such and heard voices.

Nikolas Cruz: http://www.cbs8.com/story/38823971/...ing-voices-he-told-officers-in-his-confession
Stephen Paddock: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...aims-last-vegas-shooting-latest-a7987481.html (I think this one is interesting because we don't know if Paddock actually heard voices but the "mental anguish" part is extremely interesting)
Florida shooter: https://indianexpress.com/article/world/alaska-man-gets-life-in-prison-for-florida-airport-shooting/
About the recent Jacksonville shooter David Katz: https://medium.com/@DrDannielle/the-race-to-bury-david-katz-dc5eee49c098 (look for the phrase "hearing voices")
Also, an article I found on the Bluebeam Project: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_bluebeam01.htm

#ASHLIE #2

Thoughts, views, analysis, research, observation, expression, opinion, presentation are that of the author and the author alone. All assertions are theories based reasonably on available factual information.

Sunday, March 3, 2019

The Secret Life of Timothy McVeigh - Operation PATCON - Sheep Dipped - Waco & the ATF's Huge Blunder of 2019

Timothy McVeigh. We've been told so much about him, the Oklahoma City bombing, and what it meant for America. But what if it's all a lie? Join us today for this special Corbett Report podcast-documentary as we examine the multiple trucks, multiple bombs, government informants, faked executions and other pieces of information suggesting that McVeigh was not a "lone wolf bomber" at all but a sheepdipped special forces operative working for the government, exactly as he claimed.

TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=14714

The following posts below the video Brian Young (HighImpactFlix.com) and I did by the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms lead me to delve back into a subject of great concern to many of us. Waco Texas Massacre that again leads me to share relevant information regarding Oklahoma City Bombing of the Murrah Federal Building. In this post, no mention of the men women and children who were incinerated or the military psychological torture they were forced to endure for still unsubstantiated claims. The result was a dumpster fire of mass proportions. I am shocked the posts are still up.

This is my breakdown of the WACO post situation and Waco the Raid

Brian's Shorter Report

Please comment on these posts and tell them RTR said hi.

Here is their twitter post

A fresh and in-depth look at the circumstances surrounding the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

But instead of accepting at face value the Federal Government’s deeply-flawed investigation, A NOBLE LIE features ground breaking information and eyewitness testimonies that refute the official story.

The April 19, 1995 bombing that destroyed much of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building involved far more revealing evidence than the FBI maintains.

A NOBLE LIE presents interviews with police officers, first responders, victims, journalists and investigators whose evidence demonstrates that not all the perpetrators were brought to justice.

Among the interview subjects are General Benton Partin, former head of weapons development for the Air Force, State Representative Charles Key, members of the Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee and Jesse Trentadue, whose brother Kenneth was tortured and murdered in Federal custody in the days following the bombing.

A NOBLE LIE is the only full-length documentary that addresses and answers many of the questions people have asked about the bombing. Details as to what really happened regarding this horrific event, taking the lives of 168 people, have been summarily covered up by the Federal Government. A NOBLE LIE re-examines the tragedy in a measured, informative and scholarly way, and in the process exposes the treachery that has gone unpunished.

A Noble Lie
Watch or Purchase on Amazon

Yes, Alex Jones does make an appearance in this documentary. But I am seriously in doubt that the film makers did this any more than for publicity purposes. I have some issues with Jones as my audience well knows. But the content of this film is very valid and needs to be seen. It is a quality product.

--------------

The following paper has but a few details that are questionable as to who McVeigh really was, but it has a wealth of information regarding Operation PATCON.

Informants Provocateurs and Entrapment - Examining the Histories of the FBI OPERATION PATCON and the NYPDs... by Tom Lacovara-Stewart RTR TruthMedia on Scribd

The FBI’s Secret Rules

Monday, February 25, 2019

POLICE TRY to KILL JEFF WEINHAUS - FALSELY IMPRISON HIM - SEND HIM to SOLITARY and NOW ARREST HIS PRISON APPROVED VISITOR

RTR TRUTH MEDIA - Weinhaus was a journalist that was shot four times in 2012 by MSHP. Many things have been documented in local media about his case, but not much reflected the truth of what happened that day.

(This is our radio show. Every Sunday at 11AM Mountain time on the Republic Broadcasting Network http://RepublicBroadcasting.org )

Weinhaus exposed things happening within the justice system that were not comfortable for most. Shortly after receiving about 200 tips on local corruption, he was shot twice in the head and twice in the chest.

By an absolute miracle he survived. While recovering he was charged by the Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney for assaulting an officer by shooting him. Overwhelming evidence existed at trial that he never touched his gun, but it was suppressed.

A jury is only as good as the information presented to them. Evidence of innocence including FBI witness statements were removed from trial by the prosecuting attorney. Knowingly convicting an innocent man is a travesty to justice.

Now for the most recent development, Matt Thompson, who had to be approved to visit Jeff Weinhaus went to see him after learning that Jeff had been placed "under investigation" and sent to the hole, better known as solitary confinement where even his lawyer said he could not reach or have contact with him was arrested after his visit to the prison to question the warden as to what was going on. He was stopped on the way out of the parking lot and intimidated and then later arrested at a local restaurant after calling the Governor's office to inquire what the proper policy was at the prison. He was charged with a felony for allegedly threatening the warden by informing him that he was contacting the governor.

#FreeJeffWeinhaus #BullitinMan #PoliticalPrisoner

Please sends cards and letters of encouragement to:
ERDC
Jeffrey R. Weinhaus
DOC #1261778
2727 Hwy K
Bonne Terre, Mo. 63628

If you would like to send money directly to Jeff in prison to help show your support for Jeff-Bulletinman you may send it through:
https://www.jpay.com/

Jeff Weinhaus-Bulletinman is a very spiritual person & made many videos of himself during services at church praising the Lord! Here is the link to those videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6rKLWz5EmP0E6FTYTtvRgw

You can view many other videos of Jeff Weinhaus-Bulletinman that he published on his YouTube channel in his journey to help his fellow citizens get justice for all! https://www.youtube.com/user/bulletinman

RTR TRUTH MEDIA - Resurrect the Republic Radio Show
http://RTRTruthMedia.blogspot.com

You can check us out on the following links
https://www.subscribestar.com/rtr-truth-media

Donate - https://PayPal.me/RTRTruthMedia

Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/7JV9ghYHumD3/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/RTRTruthMedia1776
twitter - https://twitter.com/tomlacovara
Gab - https://www.gab.com/RTRTruthMedia
Listen to RTR TRUTH MEDIA Resurrect the Republic Radio Show
on Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/0xgtb2oal09k3qy7maV4Sx?si=jpQI5P-IQHah8A0qpMVG7Q

Subscribe to our Backup Channels
RTR 2
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWs4XqWLIx3znLMmcrvrS-g
RTR 3
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtJL5F2SGGz-0u-pkA-YlSQ
RTR 4
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrePuhwNXtYnVCGp_AvEpMg

Sunday, January 27, 2019

The Federal Government Wants Your DNA: The FBI’s Diabolical Plan To Create A Nation Of Suspects

Authored by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,

“As more and more data flows from your body and brain to the smart machines via the biometric sensors, it will become easy for corporations and government agencies to know you, manipulate you, and make decisions on your behalf. Even more importantly, they could decipher the deep mechanisms of all bodies and brains, and thereby gain the power to engineer life. If we want to prevent a small elite from monopolising such godlike powers, and if we want to prevent humankind from splitting into biological castes, the key question is: who owns the data? Does the data about my DNA, my brain and my life belong to me, to the government, to a corporation, or to the human collective?”―Professor Yuval Noah Harari

Uncle Sam wants you.

Correction: Uncle Sam wants your DNA.

Actually, if the government gets its hands on your DNA, they as good as have you in their clutches.

Get ready, folks, because the government— helped along by Congress (which adopted legislation allowing police to collect and test DNA immediately following arrests), President Trump (who signed the Rapid DNA Act into law), the courts (which have ruled that police can routinely take DNA samples from people who are arrested but not yet convicted of a crime), and local police agencies (which are chomping at the bit to acquire this new crime-fighting gadget)—is embarking on a diabolical campaign to create a nation of suspects predicated on a massive national DNA database.

As the New York Times reports:

“The science-fiction future, in which police can swiftly identify robbers and murderers from discarded soda cans and cigarette butts, has arrived. In 2017, President Trump signed into law the Rapid DNA Act, which, starting this year, will enable approved police booking stations in several states to connect their Rapid DNA machines to Codis, the national DNA database. Genetic fingerprinting is set to become as routine as the old-fashioned kind.”

Referred to as “magic boxes,” these Rapid DNA machines – portable, about the size of a desktop printer, highly unregulated, far from fool-proof, and so fast that they can produce DNA profiles in less than two hours – allow police to go on fishing expeditions for any hint of possible misconduct using DNA samples.

Journalist Heather Murphy explains:

“As police agencies build out their local DNA databases, they are collecting DNA not only from people who have been charged with major crimes but also, increasingly, from people who are merely deemed suspicious, permanently linking their genetic identities to criminal databases.”

Suspect Society, meet the American police state.

Every dystopian sci-fi film we’ve ever seen is suddenly converging into this present moment in a dangerous trifecta between science, technology and a government that wants to be all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful.

By tapping into your phone lines and cell phone communications, the government knows what you say.

By uploading all of your emails, opening your mail, and reading your Facebook posts and text messages, the government knows what you write.

By monitoring your movements with the use of license plate readers, surveillance cameras and other tracking devices, the government knows where you go.

By churning through all of the detritus of your life—what you read, where you go, what you say—the government can predict what you will do.

By mapping the synapses in your brain, scientists—and in turn, the government—will soon know what you remember.

And by accessing your DNA, the government will soon know everything else about you that they don’t already know: your family chart, your ancestry, what you look like, your health history, your inclination to follow orders or chart your own course, etc.

Of course, none of these technologies are foolproof.

Nor are they immune from tampering, hacking or user bias.

Nevertheless, they have become a convenient tool in the hands of government agents to render null and void the Constitution’s requirements of privacy and its prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Consequently, no longer are we “innocent until proven guilty” in the face of DNA evidence that places us at the scene of a crime, behavior sensing technology that interprets our body temperature and facial tics as suspicious, and government surveillance devices that cross-check our biometrics, license plates and DNA against a growing database of unsolved crimes and potential criminals.

The government’s questionable acquisition and use of DNA to identify individuals and “solve” crimes has come under particular scrutiny in recent years.

Until recently, the government was required to at least observe some basic restrictions on when, where and how it could access someone’s DNA. That has all been turned on its head by various U.S. Supreme Court rulings that pave the way for suspicionless searches and herald the loss of privacy on a cellular level.

Certainly, it was difficult enough trying to protect our privacy in the wake of a 2013 Supreme Court ruling in Maryland v. King that likened DNA collection to photographing and fingerprinting suspects when they are booked, thereby allowing the government to take DNA samples from people merely “arrested” in connection with “serious” crimes.

Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Maryland v. King is worth reading not only for the history lesson on the Fourth Amendment but for its clear-sighted rebuke of the police state’s tendency to justify every encroachment on our freedoms as necessary for security.

As Scalia noted:

“Solving unsolved crimes is a noble objective, but it occupies a lower place in the American pantheon of noble objectives than the protection of our people from suspicionless law-enforcement searches… Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason. Today’s judgment will, to be sure, have the beneficial effect of solving more crimes; then again, so would the taking of DNA samples from anyone who flies on an airplane (surely the Transportation Security Administration needs to know the “identity” of the flying public), applies for a driver’s license, or attends a public school. Perhaps the construction of such a genetic panopticon is wise. But I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of our liberties would have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection.”

The Court’s decision to let stand the Maryland Court of Appeals’ ruling in Raynor v. Maryland, which essentially determined that individuals do not have a right to privacy when it comes to their DNA, made Americans even more vulnerable to the government accessing, analyzing and storing their DNA without their knowledge or permission.

Although Glenn Raynor, a suspected rapist, willingly agreed to be questioned by police, he refused to provide them with a DNA sample.

No problem. Police simply swabbed the chair in which Raynor had been sitting and took what he refused to voluntarily provide.

Raynor’s DNA was a match, and the suspect became a convict.

As the dissenting opinion in Raynor for the Maryland Court of Appeals rightly warned, “a person desiring to keep her DNA profile private, must conduct her public affairs in a hermetically sealed hazmat suit…. The Majority’s holding means that a person can no longer vote, participate in a jury, or obtain a driver’s license, without opening up his genetic material for state collection and codification.”

Yet in refusing to hear the case, the U.S. Supreme Court gave its tacit approval for government agents to collect shed DNA, likening it to a person’s fingerprints or the color of their hair, eyes or skin.

Whereas fingerprint technology created a watershed moment for police in their ability to “crack” a case, DNA technology is now being hailed by law enforcement agencies as the magic bullet in crime solving.

It’s what police like to refer to a “modern fingerprint.”

However, unlike a fingerprint, a DNA print reveals everything about “who we are, where we come from, and who we will be.”

With such a powerful tool at their disposal, it was inevitable that the government’s collection of DNA would become a slippery slope toward government intrusion.

All 50 states now maintain their own DNA databases, although the protocols for collection differ from state to state. Increasingly, many of the data from local databanks are being uploaded to CODIS (Combined DNA Index System), the FBI’s massive DNA database, which has become a de facto way to identify and track the American people from birth to death.

Even hospitals have gotten in on the game by taking and storing newborn babies’ DNA, often without their parents’ knowledge or consent. It’s part of the government’s mandatory genetic screening of newborns. However, in many states, the DNA is stored indefinitely.

What this means for those being born today is inclusion in a government database that contains intimate information about who they are, their ancestry, and what awaits them in the future, including their inclinations to be followers, leaders or troublemakers.

For the rest of us, it’s just a matter of time before the government gets hold of our DNA, either through mandatory programs carried out in connection with law enforcement and corporate America, by warrantlessly accessing our familial DNA shared with geneological services such as Ancestry and 23andMe, or through the collection of our “shed” or “touch” DNA.

All of those fascinating, geneological ancestral searches that allow you to trace your family tree can also be used against you and those you love. As law professor Elizabeth Joh explains, “When you upload your DNA, you’re potentially becoming a genetic informant on the rest of your family.”

While much of the public debate, legislative efforts and legal challenges in recent years have focused on the protocols surrounding when police can legally collect a suspect’s DNA (with or without a search warrant and whether upon arrest or conviction), the question of how to handle “shed” or “touch” DNA has largely slipped through without much debate or opposition.

Yet as scientist Leslie A. Pray notes:

We all shed DNA, leaving traces of our identity practically everywhere we go. Forensic scientists use DNA left behind on cigarette butts, phones, handles, keyboards, cups, and numerous other objects, not to mention the genetic content found in drops of bodily fluid, like blood and semen. In fact, the garbage you leave for curbside pickup is a potential gold mine of this sort of material. All of this shed or so-called abandoned DNA is free for the taking by local police investigators hoping to crack unsolvable cases. Or, if the future scenario depicted at the beginning of this article is any indication, shed DNA is also free for inclusion in a secret universal DNA databank.

What this means is that if you have the misfortune to leave your DNA traces anywhere a crime has been committed, you’ve already got a file somewhere in some state or federal database—albeit it may be a file without a name.

As Forensic magazine reports, “As officers have become more aware of touch DNA’s potential, they are using it more and more. Unfortunately, some [police] have not been selective enough when they process crime scenes. Instead, they have processed anything and everything at the scene, submitting 150 or more samples for analysis.”

Even old samples taken from crime scenes and “cold” cases are being unearthed and mined for their DNA profiles.

Today, helped along by robotics and automation, DNA processing, analysis and reporting takes far less time and can bring forth all manner of information, right down to a person’s eye color and relatives. Incredibly, one company specializes in creating “mug shots” for police based on DNA samples from unknown “suspects” which are then compared to individuals with similar genetic profiles.

If you haven’t yet connected the dots, let me point the way.

Having already used surveillance technology to render the entire American populace potential suspects, DNA technology in the hands of government will complete our transition to a suspect society in which we are all merely waiting to be matched up with a crime.

No longer can we consider ourselves innocent until proven guilty.

Now we are all suspects in a DNA lineup until circumstances and science say otherwise.

Of course, there will be those who point to DNA’s positive uses in criminal justice, such as in those instances where it is used to absolve someone on death row of a crime he didn’t commit, and there is no denying its beneficial purposes at times.

However, as is the case with body camera footage and every other so-called technology that is hailed as a “check” on government abuses, in order for the average person—especially one convicted of a crime—to request and get access to DNA testing, they first have to embark on a costly, uphill legal battle through red tape and, even then, they are opposed at every turn by a government bureaucracy run by prosecutors, legislatures and law enforcement.

What this amounts to is a scenario in which we have little to no defense of against charges of wrongdoing, especially when “convicted” by technology, and even less protection against the government sweeping up our DNA in much the same way it sweeps up our phone calls, emails and text messages.

Yet if there are no limits to government officials being able to access your DNA and all that it says about you, then where do you draw the line?

As technology makes it ever easier for the government to tap into our thoughts, our memories, our dreams, suddenly the landscape becomes that much more dystopian.

With the entire governmental system shifting into a pre-crime mode aimed at detecting and pursuing those who “might” commit a crime before they have an inkling, let alone an opportunity, to do so, it’s not so far-fetched to imagine a scenario in which government agents (FBI, local police, etc.) target potential criminals based on their genetic disposition to be a “troublemaker” or their relationship to past dissenters.

Equally disconcerting: if scientists can, using DNA, track salmon across hundreds of square miles of streams and rivers, how easy will it be for government agents to not only know everywhere we’ve been and how long we were at each place but collect our easily shed DNA and add it to the government’s already burgeoning database?

As always there will be those voices—well-meaning, certainly—insisting that if you want to save the next girl from being raped, abducted or killed, then we need to give the government all the tools necessary to catch these criminals before they can commit their heinous crimes.

If you care for someone, you’re particularly vulnerable to this line of reasoning. Of course we don’t want our wives butchered, our girlfriends raped, our daughters abducted and subjected to all manner of atrocities.

But what about those cases in which the technology proved to be wrong, either through human error or tampering? It happens more often than we are told.

For example, David Butler spent eight months in prison for a murder he didn’t commit after his DNA was allegedly found on the murder victim and surveillance camera footage placed him in the general area the murder took place. Conveniently, Butler’s DNA was on file after he had voluntarily submitted it during an investigation years earlier into a robbery at his mother’s home. The case seemed cut and dried to everyone but Butler who proclaimed his innocence. Except that the DNA evidence and surveillance footage was wrong: Butler was innocent.

Moreover, despite the insistence by government agents that DNA is infallible, New York Times reporter Andrew Pollack makes a clear and convincing case that DNA evidence can, in fact, be fabricated. Israeli scientists “fabricated blood and saliva samples containing DNA from a person other than the donor of the blood and saliva,” stated Pollack. “They also showed that if they had access to a DNA profile in a database, they could construct a sample of DNA to match that profile without obtaining any tissue from that person.”

The danger, warns scientist Dan Frumkin, is that crime scenes can be engineered with fabricated DNA.

Now if you happen to be the kind of person who trusts the government implicitly and refuses to believe it would ever do anything illegal or immoral, then the prospect of government officials—police, especially—using fake DNA samples to influence the outcome of a case might seem outlandish.

Yet as history shows – and as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People – the probability of our government acting in a way that is not only illegal but immoral becomes less a question of “if” and more a question of “when.”

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

FBI Can’t Pay Scumbag Informants - Government Shutdown Win!

RTR TRUTH MEDIA - The #FBI can't pay it's scumbag "Manufactured Terrorism: #Informants because of the #GovtShutdown.

The Schaeffer Cox Story -

https://rtrtruthmedia.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-schaeffer-cox-story-political-assassination-fbi-doj.html?m=0

You can check us out on the following links

https://www.subscribestar.com/rtr-truth-media

Donate - https://PayPal.me/RTRTruthMedia

Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/7JV9ghYHumD3/

Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/RTRTruthMedia1776

twitter - https://twitter.com/tomlacovara

Gab - https://www.gab.com/RTRTruthMedia

Listen to RTR TRUTH MEDIA Resurrect the Republic Radio Show

on Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/0xgtb2oal09k3qy7maV4Sx?si=jpQI5P-IQHah8A0qpMVG7Q

Subscribe to our Backup Channels

RTR 2

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWs4XqWLIx3znLMmcrvrS-g

RTR 3

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtJL5F2SGGz-0u-pkA-YlSQ

RTR 4

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrePuhwNXtYnVCGp_AvEpMg

Thursday, January 17, 2019

Terrorist Attack on White House Foiled by FBI - But Not Really - Blackstone Intelligence

Wednesday, January 2, 2019

BREAKING NEWS - HACKERS CLAIM to HAVE FILES to EXPOSE 9/11 and COMPLETELY BLOW APART OFFICIAL STORY - SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES, LLOYD'S of LONDON to GOVT DOCS

Hacker group The Dark Overlord has threatened to leak thousands of “secret” documents stolen from insurers and government agencies that they claim reveal the truth about 9/11 – unless they’re paid not to.

The Dark Overlord, a “professional adversarial threat group” known for their hacks of Netflix, plastic surgery clinics, and other sensitive targets, posted a link to a 10GB encrypted archive of documents relating to 9/11 litigation, promising to release the encryption keys if their demands were not met in a post on Pastebin on Monday.

The group claims the documents tell the story of what really happened on one of the most notorious dates in recent history, tweeting “We’ll be providing many answers about 9.11 conspiracies through our 18,000 secret documents leak.” They published a “teaser” consisting of letters, emails, and various documents that mention law firms, the Transport Security Administration, and the Federal Aviation Administration, with a promise of more to come.

They claim to have hacked documents from not only major global insurers like Lloyds of London and Hiscox, but also Silverstein Properties, which owned the World Trade Center complex, and various government agencies. The material, which supposedly includes confidential government documents that were meant to be destroyed but were instead retained by legal firms, allegedly reveals “the truth about one of the most recognizable incidents in recent history and one which is shrouded in mystery with little transparency and not many answers.”

Anyone worried they might be named in the documents can have their names redacted – for a fee, according to the announcement. “Terrorist organizations” and “competing nation states of the USA” are also offered first dibs on the info – if they pay up. Otherwise, the hackers write, the insurers can pay an unspecified Bitcoin ransom – or “we’re going to bury you with this.”

Some of the documents were nabbed in an April hack of a law firm associated with Hiscox that the firm acknowledgescould have exposed 1,500 of its US commercial policyholders. The Dark Overlord claims that while their ransom was paid in relation to that earlier hack, their victim violated the “agreement” by cooperating with law enforcement, necessitating further extortion.

The group emerged in 2016 with hacks on medical centers, advertising sensitive data for sale on the dark web in order to force victims to pay for its removal. They infamously leaked an entire season of Netflix’s Orange is the New Black last year to prove to that company they meant business and have stolen data from more than 50 companies, according to Vice.

Sample of Documents:

Friday, December 7, 2018

THE SCHAEFFER COX STORY - The Political Assassination of an AMERICAN PATRIOT

Schaeffer Cox, a well known 2nd Amendment lobbyist who had won 38% of the vote in a State House election, became the subject of an intense FBI investigation after he angered State and Federal authorities by openly accusing them of drug trafficking and child prostitution.

Oil pipeline service company executive, Bill Allen, who had been spared prosecution on multiple counts of sexual abuse of minors in exchange for his 2008 testimony against pro-2nd Amendment Alaska Senator Ted Stevens, was among those implicated. “The State Wide Drug Taskforce supplied children for sex to a number of state and federal officials in exchange for those official’s cooperation in concealing the ongoing illicit drug trafficking activities of the State Wide Drug Taskforce,” Schaeffer Cox said.

Not long after these public statements, the same departments that Schaeffer Cox accused of corruption sent in numerous provocateurs to try to switch his efforts off of exposing corruption and on to violent vigilante-type actions. Schaeffer cox, who believes in non-aggression and voluntarism, can be heard on multiple undercover recordings telling the provocateurs, “No, I’m going to pull a Ghandi, NOT a Rambo” and “if we turn violent, people will see us as the bad guys.”

In what some have called a deviation from accepted investigative techniques, the FBI responded to Schaeffer Cox’s rejection of their violent proposals by creating a threat to his children that could serve as a motivator.

Working with the Office of Child Services, the FBI filed a child neglect complaint regarding Schaeffer and his wife Marti’s 1 and 1/2 year old son. Because they do not require probable cause, child neglect complaints are an attractive tool for investigators who wish to enter a home, but lack any evidence to support a warrant.

Once Schaeffer Cox was made aware of the “writ of assistance” issued for the seizure of his young son, the FBI dispatched undercover provocateur, Bill Fulton, to again try to convince Schaeffer Cox to go on a shooting spree in response to these new developments. Bill Fulton, acting under the supervision of FBI Special Agent Sandra Klein, pointed out that the child neglect complaint was obviously the corrupt work of Schaeffer Cox’s political adversaries in the government, and urged him to go kill all officials involved.

When Schaeffer Cox and his friend, Les Zerbe, refused Fulton’s violent suggestions a second time, Fulton flew into a rage, held a hunting knife to Les Zerbe’s throat, and told him he would “slit his throat open and bleed him out at his feet” if he and Cox didn’t agree to the proposed mass shooting. Cox and Zerbe refused, and escaped never to see Fulton again.

Suspecting foul play by the FBI and local police, and fearing for their lives from Fulton, Schaeffer Cox and his wife went to the military police station on Ft. Wainwright for help. Officers there advised Schaeffer Cox that Federal agents had come into the station and bragged of how they planned to “fix the Schaeffer Cox problem” by “going into his home to take out his kid, then just shoot Schaeffer Cox in the process.” The MP’s gave Schaeffer Cox’s attorney affidavits to this effect and would later testify to the same under oath.

At FBI Special Agent Klein’s direction, Fulton made a third attempt to get Schaeffer Cox to do a mass shooting. Fulton did this by issuing a death threat ultimatum and promising to kill Schaeffer Cox himself if he refused the proposal of violence again.

Fearing for their lives, the Cox family packed up and headed for Canada. But the FBI sent another undercover provocateur, RJ Olson, after them, court documents say. Olson, a self described “drug wholesaler” working under the supervision of FBI Special Agent Richard Southerland, held the whole Cox family, including a 2 year old boy and a 3 week old baby girl, hostage, against their will in an attic for 21 days after sabotaging their vehicle, then using death threats from Fulton and a made up story about a truck driver to keep them from leaving.

“The government does not dispute the fact that the actions of the provocateurs working under the FBI’s supervision did in fact meet the legal definition of 1st degree kidnapping,” said Robert John, the Fairbanks attorney who got all related State charges against Cox thrown out.

On March 10th, 2011 Schaeffer Cox was taken from the attic to a deserted industrial lot in Fairbanks where he believed he would meet the “truck driver” Olson had promised. No such truck driver existed. Instead, there was a FBI ambush of out of town agents who did not know Schaeffer Cox was a well respected local political voice with popular support. The Agent’s, who had been instructed to shoot Schaeffer Cox on site if he had a weapon, were not advised by the local FBI case agent of Cox’s repeated statements about being like Ghandi not Rambo.

FBI Special Agent Richard Southerland supplied JR Olson with an unregistered, nontraceable pistol and instructed him to “put it in Schaeffer’s lap then get under the truck so there will be some thick metal between you and him when the shooting starts.” The FBI’s plan was interrupted when the owner of the industrial lot happened upon the scene and started asking questions about why men with masks and machine guns were hiding around the corner.

Schaeffer Cox was arrested and put on trial for “conspiracy against the government.” The prosecution was led by Steve Skrocki and Joseph Botini,the same people that were held in contempt of court for hiding evidence in several related trials of Alaska political personalities. The audio recording of Schaeffer Cox repeatedly rejecting violence were hidden from the jury, but are now being made available to the public by Schaeffer Cox’s supporters via youtube and other means.

Steve Skrocki, who has publically attacked Schaeffer Cox for his belief in Moral Higher Law, built his case primarily on the testimony of Fulton and Olson. But recently released audio recording and email between Steve Skrocki and his boss, US Attorney Karen Loeffler, now show that Skrocki coached his witnesses to lie, then vouched for those lies in his closing arguments to the jury.

Still others have taken issue with Skrocki’s entire theory of the case. “The importance of this case is significant to the whole of humanity,” says Larry Pratt, president of Gun Owners of America. He points out that the prosecution conceded that Cox had no actual plans for violence, but convicted him anyway based on Cox’s belief that ‘We The People’ may someday have to stand down an out of control government.

Schaeffer Cox, who has been in prison since 2011 agrees. “This amounts to sending people to prison for simply believing in the original meaning of the 2nd Amendment,” he says. “If we don’t reverse my conviction, it will set a sweeping new precedent allowing for the wholesale round up of those who have not committed any crimes.”

For more information, Contact Schaeffer’s Angels at 479-381-3307 or schaeffercox@gmail.com

Watch and Read more about Schaeffer Here.

Help through donations, letters, and social media.

https://freeschaeffer.com/donate/

STORE