Gary Fullerton Speaks Out on Reported Police Corruption on Many Levels

RTR TRUTH MEDIA

Joe Imbriano and Barry Levinson at FPD headquarters as they attempt for a second time to get the FPD’s own men in black to take a report on Chief Dan Hughes’ obstruction of justice


Posted by Joe Imbriano

Section 148(a)(1) of the California Penal Code makes it a crime to willfully “resist, delay or obstruct” a police officer or emergency medical technician in the performance of on-the-job duties.

But what happens when an officer refuses to acknowledge plain fact and evidence when you are reporting another officer who has broken the law? What happens when he/she refuses to admit the allegation is a crime when it is clearly defined as such by statute?

 Ironically, Section 148 of the penal code aka as “the boot of the police state” is the section that is almost exclusively and illegitimately used AGAINST US. This time, I believe that it directly applies to Dan Hughes and possibly even Andrew Goodrich who was the watch commander. Here is the claim for damages filed by the DA investigator who was abrubtly taken off of the case

felz

In the wee hours of the morning following election night, Dan Hughes directly interfered with an arrest, and willfully delayed and obstructed his four officers in the performance of their on the job duties. He called off the arrest of and breathalyzer administration to a suspect caught in the act of fleeing the scene of an accident as he reeked of alcohol. 

 The suspect was none other than our esteemed City Manager-Joe Felz.

The state legal system is set up to give police officers the ability to carry out their functions with minimal interference, including command staff, and anyone who interferes should face arrest and prosecution if they are perceived to be interfering with the operation of law. In fact, anyone could be charged with the crime of obstructing justice for doing virtually anything that constitutes an attempt to prevent a police officer from performing their duties. I believe Dan Hughes signed his own guilty plea when he put out that memo to the council regarding the election night incident involving our city manager.

A petrified Fullerton homeowner had called in a car crash in front of their home at 1:30 in the morning where a van ran over a tree and got itself stuck. The driver of the van was attempting to free the vehicle by continually reving up its engine, putting it in gear and reverse over and over trying to get away. What kind of police officers does Fullerton have who arrive on scene to where a man smelling of alcohol was attempting to leave the scene of an accident, and they fail to arrest and administer a breathalyzer? Whats worse is they let the alleged drunk driver who happens to be our City Manager Joe Felz call and ask for the police chief at 130 in the morning?



What kind of police chief instructs his four police officers who arrive on scene to where a man smelling of alcohol was attempting to leave the scene of an accident, to NOT to arrest him, not to administer a breathalyzer but rather wait until the police chief sends HIS special guy out possibly hours later to do a PRIVATE field sobriety test with NO BREATHALYZER, AND without the presence of another officer without and then drive him home instead of arresting him and taking him to jail? Hiding or destroying evidence or material that would be useful in proving a crime, or attempting to prevent another individual from providing information regarding a crime would have you or I facing charges of obstruction of justice. Watch Joe Imbriano and Barry Levinson at FPD headquarters as they attempt for a second time to get the FPD’s own men in black to take a report on Chief Dan Hughes’ obstruction of justice and they REFUSE.- part 1 and 2. The criminal justice system is broken folks and until law enforcement agents are held criminally liable for their actions, nothing is going to change, We need to send a strong message to all law enforcement that no one is above the law, especially those who are bestowed with arrest powers who are so handsomely paid to and entrusted with the duties to uphold and enforce it.

THE FUTURE of FREEDOM - INTERVIEW with NSA WHISTLEBLOWER WILLIAM BINNEY

A 36-year veteran of America’s Intelligence Community, William Binney resigned from his position as Director for Global Communications Intelligence (COMINT) at the National Security Agency (NSA) and blew the whistle, after discovering that his efforts to protect the privacy and security of Americans were being undermined by those above him in the chain of command. The NSA data-monitoring program which Binney and his team had developed -- codenamed ThinThread -- was being aimed not at foreign targets as intended, but at Americans (codenamed as Stellar Wind); destroying privacy here and around the world. Binney voices his call to action for the billions of individuals whose rights are currently being violated. William Binney speaks out in this feature-length interview with Tragedy and Hope's Richard Grove, focused on the topic of the ever-growing Surveillance State in America.

On January 22, 2015: (Berlin, Germany) – The Government Accountability Project (GAP) is proud to announce that retired NSA Technical Director and GAP client, William "Bill" Binney, will accept the Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence Award today in Berlin, Germany. The award is presented annually by the Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence (SAAII) to a professional who has taken a strong stand for ethics and integrity. http://whistleblower.org/press/nsa-wh... Would You Like to Know More? Subscribe to the Peace Revolution podcast produced by Tragedy and Hope: http://www.PeaceRevolution.org USEFUL LINKS T&H dot com: http://www.TragedyandHope.com T&H online Research & Development community: https://www.tragedyandhope.com/subscr... Follow on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TragedyandHope Watch on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/TragedyandHopeMag Like on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TragedyandHo... Also on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theultimateh... Link to Richard's "History Blueprint": https://www.tragedyandhope.com/the-br... ABOUT TRAGEDY AND HOPE: SUMMARY, PURPOSE, FORM, AND FUNCTION Tragedy and Hope provides a portal through which individuals can discover, identify, and integrate useful tools, resources, and activities which stimulate and fortify Cognitive Liberty, providing primary sources, research, and educational methods which facilitate consciousness. Tragedy and Hope's purpose is to enable individuals to research and form groups of independent thinkers to solve humanity's most pressing problems, by identifying the etiology (study of the cause-and-effect origins) and thus understanding our way toward the solutions we seek. Tragedy and Hope's form and function (free to the public) enables hundreds-of-thousands of people around the world (172 countries in 2014 alone), to experience open-source education without upper-limits, and it is therein where the solutions are discovered- by making the problems truly known and understood at a root-cause level.

Tragedy and Hope creates, produces, and publishes educational content to help adults understand the world they live in and thereby, develop true self-confidence and serenity of mind; our content focuses on history, philosophy, economics, anthropology, science, communications, and every topic which pertains to learning how to survive and thrive in this world. Tragedy and Hope is funded by those who tune-in to our productions, and the members of the Tragedy and Hope online critical thinking and research community, who subscribe after witnessing the value provided, and voluntarily deciding to contribute in a way to ensure we can continue producing educational media with integrity and consistency. Sacrifice the Tragedy, Preserve the Hope. T&H: Re-Contextualizing History one Episode at a Time. Thank you for Tuning-In, and not Dropping-Out!


Related Source Links / Articles - RTR
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/05/eff-and-x-civil-liberties-organizations-demand-transparency-nsa-domestic-phone

https://peacerevolution.podomatic.com/

Another very eye opening presentation from NSA Whistleblower Tom Drake

Thomas Drake is a former senior official of the National Security Agency (NSA) whom the Justice Department prosecuted under the Espionage Act. In June 2011, the case against him collapsed, but he endured four years of investigation and faced 10 felony counts after he used internal mechanisms to disclose serious wrongdoing concerning a data collection program called "Trailblazer." That program was costly, wasteful and ineffective; it threatened Americans' privacy rights, and was wholly undeveloped -- despite the availability of a cost-effective, functional alternative that protected Americans' privacy. Ultimately, the Department of Justice (DOJ) dropped all felony counts against him, and the judge excoriated DOJ lawyers for their conduct. Drake is the recipient of the 2011 Ridenhour Prize for Truth-Telling, regarded in the U.S. as the highest honor that a whistleblower can receive.

TEXAS MOM TRIES to SELL 2YR OLD for SEX to a PEDOPHILE - GETS ONLY 40 YEARS - SHOULD BE LETHAL INJECTION

A 25-year-old woman from Texas has been sentenced to 40 years behind bars for attempting to sell her two-year-old daughter for a sex act, for $1,200, to an undercover police officer who impersonated a willing pedophile.

In a carefully devised sting operation targeting child exploitation and abuse, led by Detective Serratt of the Montgomery County Precinct 1 Constable’s Office, officers managed to track down and arrest 25-year-old Sarah Peters, who in February this year planned to sell her two-year-old daughter online to someone desiring to “engage in sex acts with the child for a fee of $1,200.00.”

With this level of evil in the world, it should become apparent that the way in which this type of case is handled should send a message able to be heard from the pit of Hades. While hundreds of thousands of people sit in jail for victimless crimes, and people like this being cared for at the expense of the public, in my opinion this should be a death penalty offense. I say that because someone like this, who is willing to rob the innocence of, and have absolutely no regard for a child, a human life, has forfeited their right to live. $1,200 dollars is all her baby girl was worth. All for the pleasure of a pedophile. 

MAIN STREAM MEDIA MELTDOWN OVER TRUMP PUTIN at SUMMIT

The Main Stream Media is having a meltdown as we post this over the comments from President Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. Both Neo-Con right and Liberal Leftists are joining together in the CFR fake news social engineering and free speech destroying controlled Mockingbird Media. That’s how one truly knows how Trump is striking a nerve. 

The Main Stream Media is having a meltdown as we post this over the comments from President Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. Both Neo-Con right and Liberal Leftists are joining together in the CFR fake news social engineering and free speech destroying controlled Mockingbird Media. That’s how one truly knows how Trump is striking a nerve. 

Putin stuns the world as he suggests a pre-existing treaty exists to allow US Law Enforcement to come to Russia to interview and indict any lawbreakers, if the US will reciprocate. I lost my coffee when the crimes of the Clinton email scandal was mentioned. Everyone in the mainstream is so preoccupied with Russia Russia Russia precisely because those emails likely would have completely exposed the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation scandal. 

This is Jake Morphonios of BLACKSTONE Intelligence 

http://BlackstoneIntel.com

Putin stuns the world as he suggests a pre-existing treaty exists to allow US Law Enforcement to come to Russia to interview and indict any lawbreakers, if the US will reciprocate. I lost my coffee when the crimes of the Clinton email scandal was mentioned. Everyone in the mainstream is so preoccupied with Russia Russia Russia precisely because those emails likely would have completely exposed the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation scandal. 

This is Jake Morphonios of BLACKSTONE Intelligence 

http://BlackstoneIntel.com

Arizona Ranchers on the Front Lines - Border Battles

Arizona ranchers aren't just battling mother nature and lost cattle — they're battling illegal aliens, drug cartels, and the U.S. Border Patrol.

 Michelle Malkin Investigates

  Border Battles: Arizona Ranchers on the Front Lines

BUNDY TRIAL EXPOSES BLM CONSPIRACY to COMMIT MURDER of PROTESTERS

RTR Truth Media -
Tom Lacovara-Stewart 7/12/18

While celebration commences in the latest victory for persecuted ranchers Dwight and Stephen Hammond by the pardon issued by President Trump we must realize that exposing the truth and the fight for freedom moves on. It's time to call it like it is. While we watch mainstream media continue to propagandize the public regarding the Bundy Standoff, and events at Malheur in Oregon, important information is slipping passed. And to date not one federal agent or prosecutors who have collectively broken many laws have been charged with those crimes but the two FBI agents who fired first upon LaVoy and company hitting Ryan Bundy in the arm and killing LaVoy Finicuim.

In this video you will hear Ammon Bundy's testimony from the trial that Federal Agents conspired to commit acts of blatant murderous activities upon protesters while laughing and joking about it. If the same had been of those protesting speaking of "shoot to kill" actions planned against federal agents there would have been even more charges and likely a minimum of 20 years in Federal prison. In my humble opinion, as long as these people have no "title of nobility", and actually even if they did, they should be governed by the same laws you and I are. And it is absolutely clear that equal protection under the law, and fair treatment is but a myth.

Listen carefully to Ammon Bundy's words regarding the comments of the Bureau of Land Management agents that was captured on their own body cameras. All they were awaiting was to be unleashed. But while waiting, these thugs were speaking of shooting women in the head and plans to kill. No official "ROE" or Rules of Engagement were officially sanctioned as "shoot to kill", at least not officially. Makes you wonder why the Bureau of Land Management illegally shredded a large portion of the evidence of their investigation.



From the Las Vegas Review Journal: November 10, 2016

Bureau of Land Management agents shredded sensitive documents about their roundup of Bundy family cattle in the tense hours before their April 2014 standoff with armed Bundy followers, federal prosecutors have confirmed.

In court papers, prosecutors said the hurried shredding occurred as agents at the impoundment site feared they were in imminent danger and about to be overrun by a crowd of angry Bundy supporters.

The shredding began the evening of April 11, 2014, and continued until BLM agents were forced to abandon the impoundment camp the next morning, BLM Agent Kent Kleman wrote in an accompanying four-page affidavit.

Among the items shredded were copies of the impoundment operations plan, maps and papers containing cellphone numbers and personal information about government employees and contractors involved in the roundup, Kleman said.

The destruction of the documents was necessary to “prevent disclosure of law enforcement sensitive information to persons engaged in criminal activity,” prosecutors wrote in their court papers.

So the claim is that this was "sensitive material".   They were "worried about being overrun and the material being seized by the Bundy Protesters". This explanation is not only laughable but it also shows what they were actually producing themselves was the fecal matter of cows (BS) while shooting prize bulls in the head and shooting more and placing them in a huge mass grave hole dug by them in the desert which I personally recorded with Ryan Bundy and Jerry Delemus.

Of course this same agency had prosecutors, FBI, helicopters, trucks coming and going, etc.

So why was this evidence not simply removed to storage pending the trials? 

The "destruction of documents" (a crime) is then justified in their minds because they were scared.

The same thugs that were chomping at the bit on body cams to kill protesters.

Defense investigator, Keith Gordon, had obtained bags of shredded evidence left behind by the BLM, and Hill sought to dismiss the charges against his client on grounds it amounted to the destruction of evidence in the criminal case.

But prosecutors responded that the dismissal is unwarranted and that Hill failed to establish that he has been unable to obtain copies of the shredded documents from other sources.

They also argued in their court papers that the shredding occurred because the BLM agents did not want the information to fall into the hands of people who had threatened them. It was not done to withhold evidence in a criminal case put together nearly two years later, they said.

In his affidavit, Kleman added that the shredding was “not conducted in bad faith or to hide exculpatory information that would have been useful to the defense.”

Kleman said agents had a duty as law enforcement officers to keep the internal documents from the Bundy forces as tensions mounted during the confrontation.

“Such information was contained in the confidential operational plan from the impound, which is a master planning document of the operation that included not only details of how the government planned to carry out the cattle impound but also included detailed personal information of the government employees and contractors who planned and participated in the operation,” Kleman said.

Hill offered a different opinion in an interview.

“The government’s nonchalance about the destruction of evidence is just the latest travesty in this case,” he said. “In this country, you have a right to see the documents made by the people trying to put you in prison. The government shouldn’t get a pass for shredding papers and notes that just might have shown that Ammon didn’t do anything wrong.

The shredding effort comes on the heels of another unusual government disclosure in the high-profile case.

For more on the criminal acts of the Bureau of Land Management and the (in our opinion) malfeasance by US Prosecutor Myhre:
 https://itmattershowyoustand.com/2017/09/corruption-continues-in-upcoming-bundy-ranch-trial-as-prosecution-asks-judge-to-not-allow-defendants-to-defend-themselves/

Prosecutors confirmed in court documents that undercover FBI agents posed as a documentary film crew to gather evidence during their investigation into the Bunkerville standoff. Ryan Bundy was deeply suspicious about this so called production company as you can see here:
What freedom of the press do we really have, especially if you are a whistle-blower or someone revealing government corruption, if you have to assume the press interviewing you are themselves undercover agents?

Defense lawyers who have seen FBI reports of the undercover operation have said in court documents that the company’s name was Longbow Productions.

Several of the defendants charged in the case, including Ammon Bundy, were tricked into doing interviews with the undercover agents before they were charged, defense lawyers have alleged. These FBI agents posing as journalists fed Greg Burleson booze and got him to speak hypothetically about the "defensive perimeter" of the Ranch and or Militia camp, while the BLM openly were chomping at the bit to commit murder with impunity.

Prosecutors contend the ruse was a proper investigative technique. Of course they do. What do they care about the Free Press or the chilling effect this all will have for people trying to get the word out about government corruption and overreach?

“We cannot overstate how damaging it is for federal agents to pose as journalists,” Katie Townsend, the litigation director for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said in a statement. “This practice undermines the credibility of the independent news media, and should not be tolerated.”

The Hill, August 27, 2015

For more on Longbow and this entrapment scheme click here - https://redoubtnews.com/2017/03/longbow-productions-fbi-reloaded/

More evidence and interviews with Cliven, Ryan and Ammon Bundy
by RTR Truth Media - Resurrect the Republic

Resurrect the Republic - RTR Truth Media Exclusive with Ammon Bundy


Did the BLM send a militarized force upon the American People??

Tom Lacovara-Stewart & Ammon Bundy - BLM Exposed!

Tom Lacovara-Stewart - Cliven Bundy Interview

1957 U.S. News and World Report Declares Fourteenth Amendment Un Constitutional Usurpation

Flashback 1957: U.S. News and World Report Declares " There is No “Fourteenth Amendment”!

Flashback 1957. U.S. News and World Report declares there's no legally ratified 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:

There is No “Fourteenth Amendment”! Not lawfully anyway....

US NEWS & WORLD REPORT 

by

David Lawrence

U.S. News & World Report

September 27, 1957

printed verbatim

A MISTAKEN BELIEF — that there is a valid article in the Constitution known as the “Fourteenth Amendment” — is responsible for the Supreme Court decision of 1954 and the ensuing controversy over desegregation in the public schools of America. No such amendment was ever legally ratified by three fourths of the States of the Union as required by the Constitution itself. The so-called “Fourteenth Amendment” was dubiously proclaimed by the Secretary of State on July 20, 1868. The President shared that doubt. There were 37 States in the Union at the time, so ratification by at least 28 was necessary to make the amendment an integral part of the Constitution. Actually, only 21 States legally ratified it. So it failed of ratification.

The undisputed record, attested by official journals and the unanimous writings of historians, establishes these events as occurring in 1867 and 1868:

Outside the South, six States — New Jersey, Ohio, Kentucky, California, Delaware and Maryland — failed to ratify the proposed amendment.
In the South, ten States — Texas, Arkansas, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi and Louisiana — by formal action of their legislatures, rejected it under the normal processes of civil law.
A total of 16 legislatures out of 37 failed legally to ratify the “Fourteenth Amendment.”
Congress — which had deprived the Southern States of their seats in the Senate — did not lawfully pass the resolution of submission in the first instance.
The Southern States which had rejected the amendment were coerced by a federal statute passed in 1867 that took away the right to vote or hold office from all citizens who had served in the Confederate Army. Military governors were appointed and instructed to prepare the roll of voters. All this happened in spite of the presidential proclamation of amnesty previously issued by the President. New legislatures were thereupon chosen and forced to “ratify” under penalty of continued exile from the Union. In Louisiana, a General sent down from the North presided over the State legislature.

There's more:

Secretary of State Seward was on the spot in July 1868 when the various “ratifications” of a spurious nature were placed before him. The legislatures of Ohio and New Jersey had notified him that they rescinded their earlier action of ratification. He said in his official proclamation that he was not authorized as Secretary of State “to determine and decide doubtful questions as to the authenticity of the organization of State legislatures or as to the power of any State legislature to recall a previous act or resolution of ratification.” He added that the amendment was valid “if the resolutions of the legislatures of Ohio and New Jersey, ratifying the aforesaid amendment, are to be deemed as remaining of full force and effect, notwithstanding the subsequent resolutions of the legislatures of these States.” This was a very big “if.” It will be noted that.....

......the real issue, therefore, is not only whether the forced “ratification” by the ten Southern States was lawful, but whether the withdrawal by the legislatures of Ohio and New Jersey — two Northern States — was legal. The right of a State, by action of its legislature, to change its mind at any time before the final proclamation of ratification is issued by the Secretary of State has been confirmed in connection with other constitutional amendments.

Oregon also withdrew, and a few more .....
go to DirdyUncleSam.com / ResurrectTheRepublic.com