STORE
- Home
- FREEDOM DOCS - SOCIALISM the NEW US CIVIL RELIGION
- Resurrect the Republic Radio Show - Episodes
- CHATROOM
- OUR LINKS & NEWS AGGREGATION
- HOSTS
- VACCINES - LEARN the RISK
- ISRAEL - ROTHSCHILD ZIONISM
- INTELLIGENCE - NAT SEC - ANALYSIS SITES
- FBI - CONSPIRACY - DOMESTIC TERRORISM
- RTR STORE / MERCH
- DONATE
Thursday, October 10, 2019
EVIDENCE of FOREKNOWLEDGE of 9/11 ATTACKS STILL GOES UNINVESTIGATED
Saturday, August 3, 2019
EPSTEIN HOPED to CREATE a SUPER CHOSEN PEOPLE ADVANCED RACE OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CLONES of HIMSELF - TRANSHUMANIST EUGENICIST UTOPIA
RTR TRUTH MEDIA (New York City) Jeffrey E. Epstein, the wealthy financier who is accused of sex trafficking, had an unusual dream: He hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women at his vast New Mexico ranch.
Mr. Epstein over the years confided to scientists and others about his scheme, according to four people familiar with his thinking, although there is no evidence that it ever came to fruition.
Much of this could be distraction from what really is going on, but there are enough facts contained here to use this report to continue to illustrate the Israeli Mossad involvement. I’m also curious as to Unit 8200-Talpiots involvement into this AI/Eugenics angle.
Mr. Epstein’s vision reflected his longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence. Critics have likened transhumanism to a modern-day version of eugenics, the discredited field of improving the human race through controlled breeding. Epstein was also a proponent of Eugenics.
NYT Article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/business/jeffrey-epstein-eugenics.html
#Transhumanism #JeffreyEpstein #Eugenics
RTR TRUTH MEDIA
http://RTRTruthMedia.blogspot.com
TEAM RTR
Tom Lacovara-Stewart founder of RTR PaleoConservative Voluntarist
Rachel Tobias - AnarchoCapitalist
Chris Switzer from the Freedom Ministry Anti-Zionist American Patriot
Kellie Ann Sonnier - Writer - Investigative Reporter Documentarian
We can be reached at teamrtrtruthmedia@gmail.com
You can check us out on the following links
https://www.subscribestar.com/rtr-truth-media
Donate - https://PayPal.me/RTRTruthMedia
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/RTRTRUTHMEDIA
Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/channel/7JV9ghYHumD3/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/RTRTruthMedia1776
twitter - https://twitter.com/tomlacovara
Gab - https://www.gab.com/RTRTruthMedia
Subscribe to our Backup Channels
RTR 2
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWs4XqWLIx3znLMmcrvrS-g
RTR 3
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtJL5F2SGGz-0u-pkA-YlSQ
RTR 4
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrePuhwNXtYnVCGp_AvEpMg
Wednesday, July 31, 2019
ALAN DERSHOWITZ IGNITES EVEN MORE SUSPICION in NYT OP-ED ARGUING for LOWERING the AGE of CONSENT for a CHILD
Below is a recap of the past week or so in the life of Alan Dershowitz, the attorney and TV pundit who stands accused of having sex with two of billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged under age trafficking victims at his direction:
First, in an op-ed in Newsmax on July 17, Dershowitz publicly condemns an imminent New Yorker “hit piece” about him and his connection to Epstein, claiming that it’s full of lies. A week and a half later, the piece comes out, with both of his accusers, Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Sarah Ransome, going on the record about their experiences with Dershowitz. The article also reveals that he has a history of smearing rape victims in the press, of strangely fixating on men accused of rape in his law school classes, and of arguing to lower the age of consent to 15.
In response, Dershowitz decides … to tweet more about that last topic. No we sh!t you not!!!
Dershowitz seems to have forgotten that he suggested in his 1997 op-ed unearthed by the New Yorker that the age of consent be lowered to 15, not 16. In fact, at the time, he wrote emphatically, “It certainly should not be as high as 17 or 16.”
Despite his decision to add a year to that original number, he apparently still thought it was a good time to double down on his views. As in the op-ed, he repeated a faulty analogy comparing statutory rape laws and the constitutional right to abortion, as if they contradict each other.
This is what we might call a prime example of the fallacy that one can successfully “post through it.” Consider this a PSA that a Twitter meltdown is never a good idea, especially if you’re being sued for defamation by multiple people.
“It would be a terrible thing to criminalize lies.”
—- Alan Dershowitz