Sunday, December 24, 2017


The Bombshells Keep on Coming as Bunkerville Trial Gets Underway

Federal Prosecutors are being exposed for their underhanded tactics and entrapment setup of the Bunkerville defendants.
During a recent evidentiary hearing, Daniel Love (the Special Agent in Charge of the 2014 Bundy cattle roundup operation) called out Daniel Bogden, then-US Attorney for Nevada, as being the decision maker for the release of the cattle. Love has no problem naming names these days as he is visibly angry over being fired this past summer due to his misconduct identified by the U.S. Department of Interior’s Inspector General.
The jury in the Bundy case was selected more than a week ago, but the courtroom has been occupied with evidentiary and detention issues.  On Monday, November 13, the audience spent most of the day in the hallway as Judge Navarro held “sealed” hearings with the defendants, their lawyers, and the prosecutors.
Such secret motions and proceedings have taken up an increasing proportion of the Bundy case in the past weeks.  There are more questions than answers regarding these secret motions and hearings, including: are they even legal?
Every day brings new startling revelations.  It has recently come to light that there are photos in the discovery which show the prosecutors in the case near the scene of the 2014 standoff, prior to the first escalation of events.
The photos were apparently taken on April 3, 2014. This was 3 days before Dave Bundy’s arrest and well before any protesters arrived.  The photos show Assistant U.S. Attorney Nadia Ahmed (now one of the prosecutors of the Bundys) as well as U.S. Magistrate Judge Ferenbach at the impound site.  Also present, apparently, are other members of the U.S. Attorneys office, including possibly even then-US Attorney Daniel Bogden.
The fact that this photo is part of the sealed discovery goes to show the importance the government places on their back-door dealings which led up to the prosecutions. Why must everything be hidden from the citizens?

Friday, December 22, 2017


In this video you will clearly hear the BLM order to defy the County Sheriff when
he tells them to keep their "long guns back".  He says "they aren't needed.
It appears it was the Sheriff and not BLM AGENT Dan Love (fired) that was trying to 
de-escalate the situation caused by what has now been revealed the 
heavy handed militarized intimidation on the Bundy Ranch.


Sunday, December 17, 2017

The ExtraJudicial Plot to Kill Bundy Protesters EXPOSED Now Undeniable

The Extra Judicial Plot to Kill Bundy Protesters EXPOSED - Now Undeniable - 
Where is the Main Stream Media Coverage of this?
Whistleblower Reveals The Kill Book
SAC Dan Love, Bunkerville Stadoff 2014 (photo by Shannon Bushman, used with permission)The Kill Book

The president, a politician, Republican or Democrat, should never get to decide someone’s death by flipping through some flash cards and saying, ‘You want to kill him? Yeah, let’s go ahead and kill him’.” — Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), on CNN’s “State Of The Union,” Feb. 10.
The recently released 17 page report by whistleblower and lead investigator, Larry Wooten, details wide ranging misconduct by prosecutors and by BLM and other government actors. Among the accusations made by Wooten, was reference to a “kill book” kept by SAC Dan Love in which he bragged about causing the suicides of different individuals including Dr. Redd.
Beyond the suicides, it is unclear to what extent the “kill book” identified other people, including the Bundys and their supporters, as targets for assassination. There have been claims that, once all the discovery is released, not just the Wooten report, that more evidence will show that the Bundys and others were targeted for assassination.
One thing that has been confirmed is the use of snipers and the implied intent to assassinate. We already know how “trigger happy” the FBI was in shooting Vicky Weaver, while holding an infant child in her arms, at Ruby Ridge. There is probable cause to believe that the snipers, seen at the Bundy ranch, could have easily killed somebody associated with the Bundy cause.
Additionally, there is mounting evidence that a FBI sharpshooter fired at LaVoy Finicum and/or his passengers in an attempt to “execute extreme prejudice” and rid themselves of the problem that was growing like a virus. US Senator Ron Wyden, comparing the Malheur standoff to a virus, said that it was, “a situation where the virus was spreading,” and action needed to be taken.
One normally deals with a spreading virus by killing it. Were the assassination of Finicum, the attempted assassination of his passengers and the use of snipers at Bunkerville, all part of a government remedy to eradicate the virus through orders to kill?
Ammon Bundy, in a recent video, talks about some of the contents of the whistleblower report and how the FBI and the BLM put “x’s” through the pictures of Cliven Bundy and showed a disrespect for life.
A common practice by government is to label something with words that make them a euphemism, meaning to downplay the seriousness of something by giving it a better sounding name. A euphemism for assassination or kill orders is to “execute extreme prejudice”.
This term is used in reference to the government policy of assassinating enemies of the state, foreign or domestic.
The point I want to make is that, accusations and claims being made in the case of Bundy, Finicum and their supporters, regarding kill books or kill lists are not far fetched , nor are they a product of wacko conspiracy nuts, but fit a much bigger and far reaching policy by the US government to use assassination (murder) as a way to deal with people that they, a small group of decision makers, may consider “terrorists” or “virus”.
Senator Dennis Kucinich said that, “It doesn’t take too much of a stretch” to believe that the government policy to terminate terrorists in other parts of the world could also happen on US soil and against US citizens. (at 4:00 minutes)
We have heard Senator Harry Reid refer to the Bundys and supporters as “domestic terrorists”.
Once the term “terrorist” attaches to someone, whether foreign or domestic, it seems to give the government added justification to “reach out and touch someone” in the form of a drone missile or sniper bullet or some other form of “extreme prejudice”.
The above referenced video with Kucinich discusses how the constitutional rights to due process are being denied as the government seeks and destroys what they deem to be enemies of the state and then terminates them. The enormous injustice that is being perpetrated, not only against US citizens, is also against other human beings who don’t happen to be US citizens.
Our founders talked about inalienable and natural rights, rights that come to us for the simple fact of being human. The constitution was meant to not only protect people with US citizenship, but it was a model of conduct towards all mankind.
Denial of due process means that there are no checks and balances, none of the protections found in the Bill of Rights. Instead, somebody, often the POTUS, makes a unilateral decision to take somebody out, to take their life without a trial, without witnesses and cross examination and all the protections that we are supposed to have in a court of law. All that is bypassed with a drone missile or a sniper bullet.
The advantages and convenience of assassination are huge. By taking someone out, the government and their agencies are spared all the publicity, energy, expense and messiness of trials and investigations. The benefit of an assassination far outweighs its risk.
Quoted from article by Gary Hunt - 
In an undated email from Larry Wooten to Andrew D. Goldsmith, Associate Deputy Attorney General, National Criminal Discovery Coordinator, Wooten writes of many misdeeds in the entire Gold Butte Impound Operation, that being the operation that unfolded near Bunkerville, Nevada, back in early April 2014.
In a cover email, the eighteenth page, to Steven Myhre, United States Attorney for the Nevada District, in a forwarded email, the 17 page emails is included for a total of 18 pages. Wooten explains in the cover email that his superiors, his chain of command, would not deal with what he had presented to them. I’m not quite sure why he sent it to Myhre, since Myhre is implicated in the information, along with any others.
As I read the email, I realized that this was going to be a rather lengthy article. There were, Wooten’s own words, “Law Enforcement Supervisory Misconduct and Associated Cover-ups as well as Potential Unethical Actions, Malfeasance and Misfeasance by United States Attorney’s Office”, that I decided that I could only cover the more significant ones, and then provide the entire email for those that wanted to know more.

Friday, December 15, 2017

AMMON BUNDY - AMERICAN PATRIOT SPEAKS - Washington Representative Shea Stands Up

EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Matt Shea Exposes BLM Atrocities

In an exclusive video interview with Redoubt News, Washington State Representative Matt Shea read from a letter he received concerning a BLM whistle blower named Larry Wooten.
Wooten was the lead investigator for the Bureau of Land Management’s investigation into the Bunkerville/Gold Butte operation that went bad for them in April of 2014.
The letter outlines egregious violations and abuses committed by the Bureau of Land Management employees, lead by SAC Dan Love.
These heinous acts were discovered when Wooten was assigned to investigate the Bunkerville Standoff/Gold Butte operation that took place in April 2014.
Wooten was the lead investigator for nearly 3 years, digging into a multitude of issues. He states in the letter:
…the investigation revealed a widespread pattern of bad judgment, lack of discipline, incredible bias, unprofessionalism and misconduct, as well as likely policy, ethical, and legal violations among senior and supervisory staff at the BLM’s Office of Law Enforcement and Security.
He outlined specifics, such as very derogatory name calling, when he described the unprofessional behavior. Additionally, Wooten states that this behavior was committed “often by law enforcement supervisors who are potential witnesses and investigative team supervisors”.
Agent Wooten outlines in detail how Special Agent in Charge (SAC) Dan Love was known for his bad behavior and allowed to get away with it, as he was “the BLM OLES “Directors boy” and they indicated they were going to hide and protect him.”
But, the information that this courageous whistle blower reveals only gets worse from here.
Wooten goes on to outline that SAC Dan Love had what was called a “Kill Book as a trophy and in essence bragged about getting three individuals in Utah to commit suicide (see Operation CerberusAction out of Blanding, Utah and the death of Dr. Redd).”
The report also describes what appears to be additional people on the BLM hit list, this time, however, Wooten’s own supervisor was an accessory.
My supervisor even took photographs in the secure command post area of the Las Vegas FBI Headquarters and even after he was told that no photographs were allowed, he recklessly emailed out photographs of the “Arrest Tracking Wall” in which Eric Parker and Cliven Bundy had “X’s” through their face and body (indicating prejudice and bias).
The report that Representative Shea shared has multiple pages and is presented here for you to read for yourself.
Wooten Report
Some people might claim this is a disgruntled employee, and I would say they are probably not wrong. However, there are too many specifics included, and too many verifiable facts, to disregard the report. Any person that uncovered these abuses, and was fired for trying to report them, has every right to be disgruntled.
Wooten explains that in “February of 2017, it became clear to me that keeping quite became an unofficial condition of my future employment with the BLM, future awards, promotions, and a good future job reference.”
This report names several BLM agents and employees, but then it goes even further. The US Attorney’s office is also implicated in the cover-up:
When I asked [AUSA (First Assistant and Lead Prosecutor) Steven] Myhre if the former BLM SAC’s statements like “Go out there and kick Cliven Bundy in the mouth (or teeth) and take his cattle” and “I need you to get the troops fired up to go get those cows and not take any crap from anyone” would be exculpatory or if we would have to inform the defense counsel, he said something like “we do now,” or “it is now.”
Wooten took great risk upon himself to report the flagrant and vicious acts committed by these government representatives and the Acting US Attorney, Steven Myhre, had him fired from the investigation.
On February 18, 2017, I was removed from my position as the Case Agent Lead Investigator for the Cliven Bundy/Gold Butte Nevada Case
My supervisor told me that AUSA Steven Myhre “furiously demanded” that I be removed from the case and mentioned something about us (the BLM, specifically my supervisor) not turning over (or disclosing) discovery related material
We have previously reported on the blatant Brady violations the prosecution continues to commit. They have withheld evidence that would have easily exonerated these 19 men. The prosecution knew the Bundy family was not threat, as they have already referred to the “Threat Assessment Report” previously completed. These men should never have been incarcerated at all, let alone kept for nearly 2 years.

KrisAnne Hall on Federal Encroachment and Sovereignty to State Lawmakers

Tuesday, December 5, 2017


Ryan Bundy FREELY SPEAKS out! 


Resurrect the Republic 
RTR Truth Media 
hosts of the Radio Show
Investigative Journalists
Tom Lacovara-Stewart / Lorri Anderson 

Monday, December 4, 2017


The Creature from Jekyll Island G. Edward Griffin talked about his book, The Creature from Jekyll Island, which is a history of the creation of the Federal Reserve System. He was interviewed while attending FreedomFest, the libertarian conference held July 11-14, 2012, in Bally’s Las Vegas Hotel and Casino.  To see that video please click -  HERE 

For a better understanding of fractional reserve banking let us look to the Mises Institute:

Fractional-Reserve Banking and Money Creation

According to traditional economics textbooks, the current monetary system amplifies initial monetary injections of money. The popular story goes as follows: if the central bank injects $1 billion into the economy, and banks have to hold 10% in reserve against their deposits, this will allow the first bank to lend 90% of this $1 billion. The $900 million in turn will end up with the second bank, which will lend 90% of the $900 million. The $810 million will end up with a third bank, which in turn will lend out 90% of $810 million, and so on.
Consequently the initial injection of $1 billion will become $10 billion, i.e., money supply will expand by a multiple of 10. Note that in this example the central bank has actively initiated monetary pumping of $1 billion, which in turn banks have expanded to $10 billion.
But in a world where central banks don't target money supply but rather set targets for the overnight interest rate (e.g. the federal funds rate in the United States and the call rate in Japan) does this continue to make sense? Additionally, in some economies like Australia banks are not even compelled to hold reserves against their deposits. Surely then the entire multiplier model in the economics textbooks must be suspect.
Indeed, economists from the post-Keynesian school of economics (PK) have expressed doubt about the validity of the popular framework.
It is argued that the key source of money expansion is the demand for loans together with the willingness of banks to lend.
The supply of loans, in this way of thinking, is never independent of demand — banks supply loans only because someone is willing to borrow bank money by issuing an IOU to a bank.
Accordingly, the driving force of bank credit expansion and thus money supply expansion is the increase in the demand for loans and neither the money multiplier nor the central bank. Bank lending is not constrained here by reserves that are injected by the central bank, but by the demand for loans.
Is this objection valid?

Fractional-Reserve Banking and Creation of Money

Let us say that an increase in the demand for loans has taken place. How is a bank going to accommodate this increased demand? One way is by borrowing in financial markets or by raising equity funds. Another way of funding this increase is by using part of deposited money.
Note that banks are legally permitted to use some of the money that is placed in demand deposits. Banks treat this type of money as if it were lent to them.
For instance, if John places $100 in demand deposit he doesn't relinquish his claim over the deposited $100. He has an unlimited claim against his $100. This demand deposit should be properly regarded as not different from money in a safe deposit box. Hence, when a bank uses the deposited money as if it were lent to him the bank generates another claim on this deposited money.
Let us say that a bank lends $50 to Mike. By lending Mike $50, the bank creates a deposit for $50 that Mike can now use.
This in turn means that John will continue to have a claim against $100 while Mike will have a claim against $50. This type of lending is what fractional reserve banking is all about. The bank has $100 in cash against claims, or deposits, of $150. The bank therefore holds 66.7% reserves against demand deposits. The bank has created $50 out of "thin air" since the $50 is not supported by any genuine money.
A case could be made, however, that people who place their money in demand deposits do not mind banks using their money. Notwithstanding all this, as long as people trade, there will always be a demand for money, which will be held either in cash or in bank demand deposits.
Consequently, regardless of people's attitudes, once banks use deposited money, an expansion of money that is not backed by ‘real’ money is set in motion.
Although the law allows this type of practice, from an economic point of view it produces a similar outcome to that achieved by the counterfeiter. It results in money out of "thin air" which leads to consumption that is not supported by production i.e. the dilution of the pool of real wealth.
On this Mises wrote,
It is usual to reckon the acceptance of a deposit which can be drawn upon at any time by means of notes or checks as a type of credit transaction and juristically this view is, of course, justified; but economically, the case is not one of a credit transaction ... A depositor of a sum of money who acquires in exchange for it a claim convertible into money at any time which will perform exactly the same service for him as the sum it refers to, has exchanged no present good for a future good. The claim that he has acquired by his deposit is also a present good for him. The depositing of money in no way means that he has renounced immediate disposal over the utility that it commands.1
Similarly, Rothbard argued,
In this sense, a demand deposit, while legally designated as credit, is actually a present good — a warehouse claim to a present good that is similar to a bailment transaction, in which the warehouse pledges to redeem the ticket at any time on demand.2

Why the Existence of a Central Bank Permits Fractional-Reserve Banking

Let us say that for whatever reason banks are experiencing an increase in the demand for loans. Also, let us assume that the supply of loanable funds is unchanged. According to PK, banks will facilitate this increase. The demand-deposit accounts of the new borrowers will now increase.
Obviously the new deposits are likely to be employed in various transactions. After some time elapses, banks will be required to clear their checks and this is where problems might occur.
Some banks will find that to clear checks they are forced either to sell assets or to borrow the money from other banks (remember the pool of loanable funds stays unchanged).
Obviously, all this will put an upward pressure on money market interest rates and in turn on the entire interest-rate structure. To prevent banks bankruptcy the central bank will be forced to pump money e.g. through open market purchases of securities. Once the central bank starts pumping money it in fact gives the green light to the money multiplier process (the creation of credit out of "thin air"). So the conceptual outcome as depicted by the multiplier model remains intact here. The only difference is that banks initiate the lending process, which is then accommodated by the central bank.
If the multiplier process requires the support of the central bank then one can infer that, in a free market without the central bank, the likelihood of such a process emerging is not very high.
In a free market, if a particular bank tries to expand credit without backup from a genuine lender — i.e., by practicing fractional-reserve banking — it runs the risk of not being able to honor its checks, which raises the risk of bankruptcy.
  • 1. Ludwig von Mises 1980, The Theory of Money and Credit. Indianopolis, Ind: Libery Classics( pp300-01).
  • 2.Murray N. Rothbard 1978, Austrian definitions of the supply of money, in New Directions in Austrian Economics p 148.
For more we at RTR highly recommend you go and frequent the site : 

Sunday, December 3, 2017

FUTURE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS & PARENTS - Guide to Avoid a Marxist Infused College

The wide spread of Neo-Marxist ideology has been completely destructive to the universities across the nation. Within this video is a breakdown of this, and a proposed guide in how to avoid placing yourselves in an indoctrination center.


Resurrect the Republic

Tom Lacovara-Stewart

Lorri Anderson

Saturday, November 25, 2017


In true Marxist fashion of the Neo-Marxist or Cultural Marxist cancerous ideology being inflicted upon the senses of American youth, this absolute crazy ideologically mind twisted teacher tries to deny FBI crime statistics as a "cover up" in the making, and claims to be "smarter than Websters Dictionary" as the result of being a "highly intelligent woman" said the teacher. By doing so in such a way, she fits the textbook definition of a bigot. 

Below are some more examples of this pervasive leftist attack on freedom of thought and free speech.
Please submit to me more of your own examples of this insaniy and I will add them to this post.

Monday, November 28, 2016


RTR TRUTH MEDIA: D.C. ELITE - MAIN STREAM CONTROLLED MEDIA RUNNING ...: Finally some major Networks are discussing the surface of this, but as you will hear Joe Scarborough say openly....     "This is a...


Finally some major Networks are discussing the surface of this, but as you will hear Joe Scarborough say openly....     "This is a bit of a blind spot for me..... Ive heard people talking about this for a year and a half"....                            Joe Scarborough MSNBC "Morning Joe" Show                      (Comment on the Clinton Epstein direct well documented connection                          that many on the left attempted to completely deny until the                               evidence was irrefutable, well documented, trips.) In the following video you will hear that quote and much more.  We would like to thank our former RBN host Ben Swann, who used to have a show right before mine on the Network. Ben and men like him is what we need running the free and independent media. The alternative needs to pick its best and place them front and center to #DrainTheSwamp , more accurately to #DrainTheCesspool of corruption and compkete Satanic moral degeneracy. Satanism is not a protected religion. It is the anti-religion of everything this union of Republics was founded upon which was the law of the Creator, not of His antithesis.    So while it truly saddens me to have to write this. I first have to point out one of the biggest problems right off. This man, who is on what we have been lead to believe is a "News Reporting Agency", just admitted to knowing all about this, but willfully sticking his head in the sand and refusing to onvestigate and report on it? Do we now see the bigger problem?       The PRESSTITUTES NEED TO GO! PROSECUTED MANY OF THEM! Many of us whom have been scorned and attacked, called all sorts of names. Now we have been proven to have been correct all along. That is the only comfort in any of this, as to then have to share this with you all is truly a sad state of affairs. But this must be done as sickening as it is continuing the research and investigation that I have been doing for many years. From the Franklin Coverup  to the Saville and Hampstead Pedo rings.  This is so big, so real, and so twisted, and not just being completely ignored anymore but now its so big they have to deny it or face the public now KNOWING, that most of the Main Stream Media entities are nothing more than traitors for their programmed ideology in defiance of truth, of Constitution.  The main stream media is now caught having protected, and aided and abetted in the most heinous crimes this world has ever seen. Amd the media has also attempted to plant disinformation and fear of prosecution in the hearts and minds of the public such as CNN did over the Wikileaks Podesta emails which have exposed far more than ever can be seen below.  The media is now fomenting exactly what General Albert Pike said would be, and need to happen, to achieve the 3rd World War and bring on a One World Government went the pure doctrine of Lucifer would be brought out into the light.  This has been steadily happening right in front of everyone's faces while the insanity is that many are still in complete denial about it. All caused by those whom have planned it for a few hundred years , and wrote about it, everything they said would come to pass is coming to pass exactly as Pike said it would; the same secret society linked underworld controlled network is responsible, and now that the media ignored the most obvious, most well known facts, now the backlash for the disclosure of all of this, and response coming from the Main Stream Media, is comparative to the behavior of a spoiled child who refuses to accept the reality that they have been caught red handed doing something, but will look right at you lying through their teeth to tell you that its not so. They, on one hand are required to tell us. This is some form of sick tenet that has those most closely paying attention knowing what is happening. People like myself, and all the people I work with to disclose this information as we have had to learn how to best educate and inform the public in repeated attempts at breaking through the mass mind control of televison, radio and film, the advertising agency of this Luciferian doctrine. It is one huge Hegelian Dialectic. Forgive me for perhaps being redundant and repeating much information I have already shared. This presentation is for all, and many who will awaken as a result of this latest Satanic scandal, will be doing so for the first time. For those of you who know exactly what the Hegelian Dialectic as well as cognitive dissonance is, please skip this next part. The Hegelian Dialectic defined Cognitive Dissonance defined Ideological Subversion defined With the power, money, corruption, the power and force of government, and what we all know as a result of the contlomeration of all of these factors, is a combination of Operation Mockingbird Effect,  combined with Council on Foreign Relations, Rockefeller, United Nations and Soros backed plan and coup against the Union of the united States, and any or all that would defend the Inalienable Rights "identified, but not given to us by the Constitution for this Union of States, and individual Sovereign and lawful governments of them all. They have not only been lying and propagandizing, but seeking to place in control International, borderless, Single world governanace, but controlled by the most crimnal of the worlds banking elites. Those who act behind the scenes steering public reality through deliberately donfusing advertising lies to steer public opinion to gain support, and now even violent resistence. We have evidence that, and everyone is well aware that George Soros has paid many people......that is to pose as true political protesters, but who exst to unnaturally cause chaos, looting, rioting making it appear to be genuine public backlash.   Hat this does is trigger many more people who respond to what they perceive is a real event, and as they see others rallying, they feel somehow morally drawn to do the same. It is a part of the human condition so well understood, and used by agent provoceteurs to benefit either a corrupt government agenda, such as the attack on the right to bear arms, or a Corporate / Federal Reserve Rothschild, Rockefeller, Carnegie Doundation, Gates Foundation, etc. etc. or perhaps Council on Foreign Relations based agenda. So to be honest, this is of absolutely no suprise to me, as I have known and spoken out against this absolute explosion of information and what leftists attempt to say "Conspiracy Theory" witch hunt or whatever #CriticalTheory based argument, Marxism 101 programming, from gender studdies to womens studies courses which while which partially exist on the notion that education itself is somehow gender oriented.  Leftist Marxist programming reduces the ability impairs or in some cases compartmentally seems to cause the brain to lose critical coparative ability. They also suffer from cognitive dissonance. The professors of the "social science" what I call Marxist constructed pseudo-science political ideological subversion and programming.  Those affected by it become little more than robots repeating rhetoric whole attacking everyone else calling them what they actually are repeatedly and innsessently repeating the same lies over and over to the point that you know that they really believe this complete departure from reqlity and it is nearly as if their group think has some way of creating energy that makes many around them immediately believe the lies they continue to repeat. This is growing seriously dangerous. People being pulled from their cars beating, carjacking people who vited for Trump, while calijng Trump the racist threat who causes violence and hate hate hate hate hate. Slogans which repeat themselves with cutsie phrases and when you ask any of these perhaps paid for protesters to specifically state which comment or action Trump did to be either a Racist or a Nazi, they have nothing but "Love Trumps Hate" he hates all immigrants. This logic coming from the man who martied a foreigner and who is a legal immigrant and soon to be first lady. The the same hypocrites who had no problem with Obamas giving himself power to commit to Constitution smashing operations like Operation Choke Point, or Operation Fast and Furious. Now is the most important time to lay it all on the table. And I am not against doing so exposing both sides politically, as a true career criminal...... someone who plans plots, conspires to and acts upon the cause of violating another person, or other people, towns groups, individuals, and most especially children.... Your days are now numbered. With all attempts by the main stream media to deny, or make light of dismissing as "Comspiracy Theories" or as a witch hunt, Here is the problem.  There is EVIDENCE !!!  


 Resurrect the Republic Radio Show on the Republic Broadcasting Network M-F 10PM Eastern



Saturday, November 19, 2016

Trey Gowdy Jason Chaffetz Ask Secret Service "Who Do You Think You Are"?

When an agency of government becomes so large and powerful that they believe their authority exceeds that of the body that created it, which was Congress, then the House Oversight Committee gets infuritaed. Much the same it is when We The People become infuriated with the Federal Government which we created, when they believe they have more authority than we do.