Monday, February 8, 2021

When Murdering a Good Man on His Way to Facilitate a Peaceful Meeting with a Sheriff and Who Honorably Only Seeks Justice is Not Corrected - Freedom is a Fleeting Memory of Days Past

Original article title : Dubious decisions in LaVoy Finicum shooting case revealed in trial of acquitted FBI agent

Forward by Tom Lacovara-Stewart
Malheur National Wildlife Refuge Occupier
Alternative Media journalist, radio talk show host 
American history educator, historian, father who misses his son every day, and friend of LaVoy Finicum who not a day passes that I don’t thank God I had the privilege of it all. 

Allow me to explain why I posting this article on my site... for posterity, out of respect for my friend LaVoy who I rode with just the day before he was gunned down for the heinous crime of being on his way to meet with the Sheriff of Grant County Oregon, Sheriff Palmer. There was absolutely no reason whatsoever that anyone needed to die. They wanted him dead. Imagine if Sheriff Palmer had deputized all of us. Imagine if we were able to arrest the corrupt bastards. It takes special types of order following cowards to shoot a man in the back 3 times after hitting him with a rubber bullet in the front to make it look like he is reaching for a gun that only a select few of us “knew” where it was, which was on his dash under the Indian blanket. I’ll see you at the gates of hell... they won’t let me in. Afraid I might take over. But I’ll see you there. I hope you lay in bed sleepless every night thinking about LaVoys kids and grandkids...    and his foster kids. That man did more good in 10 minutes than you FBI gunmen do in a lifetime. I’m sorry .... I held back. Would you like me to tell you how I really feel?  

My respect to Maxine. For primarily a liberal writer, I think she was objective, as fair as anyone could hope for and she has my respect. 

When a man witnesses an injustice, and he shakes his head.confounded and does little more than complain, he becomes worse than the man who commits it. At least that man acts as he is. At least he is true to his own evil self. What of the man who does nothing knowing he has witnessed injustice and potentially injury to others?

First -   A Humble Warriors Prayer 
by Tom Lacovara-Stewart
Dear God I implore You, give me the courage to stand up to tyranny, the wisdom to not make it worse by rash impulsive actions.
Grant me the use of words that they may inspire those to turn from their evil ways, and spare us violence, but dear God nomatter my age, give me the steady hand and keen eye, the quickness of the draw and the good weather or caution to keep my powder dry... if it need be... and Lord, please do not let anyone die but if you do, let it be they who would never have received the truth and never hope to have been a better man. 
I pray you only use me as an instrument of necessity, not of glory or revenge, but simply of honorable justice if there be no other way. But if there be no other way let it be me that won’t hesitate. And please let it be me rather than my son. 


5,835
shares

(Scene of the FBI and Oregon state police confrontation with refuge occupation spokesman Robert "LaVoy" Finicum on U.S. 395 on Jan. 26, 2016. / FBI video screenshot)

BY MAXINE BERNSTEIN

The Portland trial of an FBI agent acquitted in the chaotic highway confrontation that led to the collapse of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge occupation revealed a series of dubious decisions and questionable police practices.

Both FBI agents and Oregon State Police officers used problematic tactics during and after what some witnesses described as a tumultuous and unexpected showdown at a roadblock on U.S. 395 in eastern Oregon.

Testimony in the trial of W. Joseph Astarita, a member of the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team, disclosed shots fired in apparent confusion, an unusual delay in securing the crime scene and a supervisor and another officer giving updates on the investigation to one of the two state police officers who fired fatal shots that day.

The FBI’s Inspection Division will now do an administrative review of the agents’ actions and recommend improvements.

“They’ll identify weaknesses. They’ll identify mistakes, and they’ll take actions to correct them,’’ said Greg Bretzing, the FBI special agent in charge at the time of the 2016 shooting case. He has since retired.

State police wouldn’t comment on whether any changes to policies or practices have been made by the agency, citing a lawsuit by the family of Robert “LaVoy” Finicum, the 54-year-old occupation spokesman shot and killed at the roadblock. One of the state police SWAT officers who fatally shot Finicum was promoted since the shooting.

(Refuge occupier Ryan Payne, on right, during the armed takeover of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge./ Les Zaitz) 

Among the issues:

-- Did an initial 40mm rubber bullet fired at surrendering refuge occupier Ryan Payne escalate the attempt to arrest the refuge occupation’s leaders?

An FBI agent seemed to think so. He cursed at the state police SWAT trooper, Bob Olson, who fired the round as Payne appeared to surrender when police first stopped the occupiers on U.S. 395 to arrest them.

Payne, a militia member from Montana and one of the architects of the January 2016 armed refuge takeover, was in the front seat of Finicum’s idling truck. He put his head and hands out of the truck window in what appeared to be an attempt to surrender.

FBI agent Justin Travis Elkins testified that he had his eyes trained on Payne and the state police officer's shot "was totally unexpected.''



Elkins heard another FBI agent, Tim Dugan, turn to the state police officer and yell, "WTF was that?!'' Elkins said Payne was following commands and the shot escalated the stop.

State police said Payne hesitated and was shot in the hand with the rubber round.

Payne then got out of the truck and was taken into custody. But Finicum sped off in his truck with three others in the back seat headed toward the roadblock about a mile north on the remote highway where more FBI agents and state police officers waited.

-- A state police SWAT officer identified only as Officer 1 took three shots as Finicum’s truck raced toward the roadblock. He fired even though he acknowledged that he didn’t see the driver or passengers in the truck.

Though Officer 1 said he was supposed to be in a command role at the roadblock and directing others to act, he said he shot at Finicum's truck to get it to slow down or veer off.

On cross-examination, Officer 1 said he couldn't see into the truck.

One shot hit the front of the truck’s hood. Another hit the front grill. A third struck the driver’s side mirror.

FBI agent Astarita, in contrast, said he aimed his rifle at Finicum’s truck but didn’t shoot because he couldn’t see the driver or who was inside.

State police have kept Officer 1’s name secret, saying they fear he might face threats for the subsequent fatal shooting of Finicum. Officer 1 and a second state SWAT officer identified only as Officer 2 later shot Finicum in the back after he was seen reaching into his jacket where police said he had a loaded 9mm handgun in an inside jacket pocket.

(U.S. 395 was blocked for several hours after the fatal police shooting of occupation spokesman Robert "LaVoy" Finicum. /Dave Killen)

-- Investigators didn’t put up crime scene tape to preserve evidence or set up a log tracking who was coming and going at the roadblock until more than three hours after Finicum was shot.

Testimony from state police and FBI agents showed they were unclear about who was in charge of the scene until investigators from the Deschutes County Sheriff’s Office and Tri-County Major Crime Team arrived.

It also took time for investigators to arrive to the remote location. Some state police took a more-than-two-hour detour to avoid potential conflicts on U.S. 395, having been told other militia members might arrive at the scene.

A Deschutes County sheriff’s detective described a 12-car police caravan responding from Bend, hampered by what he described as a mobile command center traveling slowly “like an old bread truck.’’ Investigators arrived on the scene about 1:30 a.m. Jan. 27, 2016. The shooting occurred about 4:34 p.m. on Jan. 26, 2016.

The crime scene log wasn't started until more than four hours after the shooting and the scene wasn't taped off until about five hours later, testimony showedBefore the tape went up, FBI infrared video showed unidentified FBI agents walking through the scene and picking things up, according to court testimony.

(Oregon State Police Superintendent Travis Hampton speaks at the Oregon U.S. attorney's office after the indictment of FBI Agent W. Joseph Astarita was announced./Stephanie Yao Long)

-- Travis Hampton, then a state police major and now head of the agency, communicated via text with Officer 1 in the days leading up to Officer 1’s first interview with detectives investigating the shooting.  

A witness to the fatal shooting, state trooper Joey Pollard, was assigned to be Officer 1’s so-called “buddy’’ officer after the shooting. That meant Pollard drove Officer 1 back to Bend that night and continued to communicate with Officer 1 before and after his Jan. 31 interview.  Pollard also drove Officer 1 and Officer 2 home after their initial processing at the Deschutes County Sheriff’s Office the night of the shooting.

Pollard had been in the tree line on the west side of the highway as Finicum stepped away from his truck in a snowbank. Pollard yelled commands at Finicum, initially aiming a handgun at him, but then switched to a Taser.  Officers 1 and 2 both said they worried Pollard was in harm’s way.

Pollard also was present when a state police forensic scientist examined Finicum’s truck and a bullet hole to the roof. Pollard shared what he learned with Officer 1, according to trial testimony.

Most police agencies give gag orders to officers who are either involved in a shooting or witnesses to a shooting, requiring them not to communicate with other officers involved to avoid having them compare or share information that could affect their individual statements.

Officer 1 also wasn’t interviewed about his role in the shooting until five days after it happened.

Portland police require an officer to be interviewed by internal affairs within 48 hours of a shooting.

Los Angeles-based police consultants say the best practice is to interview an officer involved in a shooting the night of the incident. Delaying the interview negatively impacts investigations and undermines public confidence, according to Michael Gennaco, a former federal civil rights prosecutor who now leads The County of Los Angeles' Office of Independent Review, known as the OIR group.



(Law enforcement officials gather in Bend for a March 2016 press conference, where they announced that the fatal Jan. 26, 2016, shooting of refuge occupation spokesman Robert "LaVoy" Finicum/Beth Nakamura)

-- State police went along with unusual demands by the FBI to interview the agents from the Hostage Rescue Team as a group and not record them.

Conducting a group interview of officers -- whether they fired shots or witnessed a shooting -- is unheard of, state police detective Scott Hill testified.

But Hill said he agreed to the ultimatum because he was afraid none of the agents would talk if he didn’t. Hill was part of a state task force, led by the Deschutes County Sheriff’s Office, investigating the shooting.

The reason given why an FBI supervisor demanded the group interview in February 2016 came out at the end of the trial.

In his closing argument, defense attorney David Angeli told jurors that the agents didn’t have legal representation with them since they were so far from home, FBI headquarters in Quantico, Virginia. They apparently wanted safety in numbers without a lawyer there.

But it’s likely that the Hostage Rescue Team agents consulted with a legal representative from the FBI Agents Association and could have had someone on the phone for any interview or flown out to help them.

“Had I known earlier there was a serious question about who shot and whether HRT agents were implicated, I would have involved the FBI’s Inspection Division for the benefit of all involved,’’ said Bretzing, Oregon’s FBI agent in charge at the time.

Investigators from the FBI’s Inspection Division wouldn’t have agreed to a group interview, he said.

The Hostage Rescue Team is reportedly considering requiring a legal representative travel with the team on its missions.

(The truck refuge occupation spokesman Robert "LaVoy" Finicum was driving on Jan. 26, 2016 when he raced from a police stop and swerved into a snowbank to avoid a police roadblock on U.S. 395/ Deschutes County Sheriff's Office) 

-- State police, ordinarily required to wear body cameras, agreed not to wear the cameras during the arrests of the occupation leaders to protect the identities of the FBI Hostage Rescue Team agents.

State police detectives also normally record interviews of officers who might be involved in a shooting.

However, they didn't the night of the shooting when questioning the FBI Hostage Rescue Team members, again at the FBI's request, or during the February interview of the agents.

No one testified why the FBI didn’t want their interviews recorded.

The FBI typically doesn’t record such interviews. If the FBI’s Inspection Division had done the interview, the federal investigator would write up a report of the agent’s statement, the agent could make changes and then swear that it was true, providing a signed sworn statement.

In this case, the Hostage Rescue Team agents had someone who wasn’t at the scene write a “communal’’ FBI report on what they saw or did that day.

(Greg Bretzing, Oregon's FBI special agent in charge, at a March 2016 news conference, announcing the investigation into FBI Hostage Rescue Team agents)

-- Astarita and his colleagues on the Hostage Rescue Team each testified that they did a standard security items check, walking around the shooting scene to look for remnants of flash-bang grenades such as pins and other personal gear after Finicum was killed.

But a former head of the FBI’s training program for new agents -- who also trained Astarita in 2005 -- said nothing should have been moved at the shooting scene. And if it was moved for safety reasons, he said, the shooting investigators should have been told.

The investigators testified that they learned that FBI agents scoured the scene only after the fact by watching video from FBI planes monitoring the operation. Further, other flash-bang grenades and pins remained at the scene after the video caught the suspected agents bending down and picking things up at the scene, according to trial testimony.

Bretzing, Oregon’s head FBI agent at the time, testified that the search was unusual and concerning.

(The bullet strikes to Finicum's truck / Court exhibit)

-- Shooting investigators could find only two shell casings of eight shots fired at the roadblock. And the FBI didn’t turn over their guns for immediate examination.

Both of those things hampered the investigation, prosecutors said.

Had an FBI agent fired his rifle that day, the agent is required to alert a supervisor, who would call out the bureau’s Shooting Incident Response Team to investigate, seize the weapon and conduct a full inquiry into the shooting.

None of the agents’ rifles were immediately examined by the FBI or the shooting investigators because none of the agents said they fired that night.

After the shooting investigators found an unaccounted-for bullet hole in the roof of Finicum’s truck, FBI supervisors again asked all the Hostage Rescue Team agents if they had fired any rounds.

Astarita and his boss who was also at the roadblock, supervisory agent B.M., said they independently examined their own rifles in their 10-person tent at the tactical operations center at Burns airport a day or two after the shooting. They didn't find anything unusual to report, they testifiedB.M.'s identity also was shrouded because the FBI said he was on active duty with the Army Reserves, involved in special operations.

Astarita was acquitted on charges that he lied when he denied taking two shots at Finicum’s truck at the roadblock after it crashed into a snowbank. One bullet hit the roof of the truck and the other missed as Finicum got out of the truck with his hands up at the roadblock, investigators said. No one has acknowledged taking the shots.

Officer 1 fired three times at Finicum’s truck as it bore down on the roadblock and then two shots that struck Finicum when he walked away from the truck. Officer 2 fired one bullet that hit Finicum.

 (FBI tactical gear/ FBI) 

-- FBI supervisory agent  Mike Ferrari testified that the FBI recently has standardized how its SWAT operators load their rifle magazines. They now must put in 28 bullets.

Ferrari said the change didn’t stem from this case but because of a number of incidents throughout the FBI. He did not explain what those incidents involved.

- interjection by RTR Truth Media... we have the technology that each bullet an officer loads could be marked by adding nano-dye.

In this case, none of the FBI’s rifles were examined by investigators the night of the shooting.

The number of rounds initially loaded into Officer 1’s rifle became a point of contention during the trial. The defense argued Officer 1 could have taken the two disputed shots; Officer 1 said he loaded his rifle magazine with 29 bullets and 24 were remaining, confirming his account that he fired five shots that day and not the two disputed rounds. The defense countered that Officer 1’s rifle capacity is 31 bullets.

--Maxine Bernstein

mbernstein@oregonian.com

Sunday, February 7, 2021

MAIN STREAM MEDIA - CANCEL the TRUTH - TATTLETALES and CENSORSHIP

FORWARD by RTR TRUTH MEDIA 
Tom Lacovara-Stewart

In an extremely well written article, exposed once again are the corporate propaganda promulgating pompous pandering punks and pouty faced plandemmic pushers who are the face of the new and as Glenn has stated, a rapidly growing journalistic “beat” has arisen over the last several years that can best be described as an unholy mix of junior high hall-monitor tattling and Stasi-like (14th Amendment) citizen surveillance. 
Within parentheses - my addition. You see, all over the world this monumental feat is the as so far the grand slam of all successes as far as agendas go. This monumental shift toward achieving the very old march toward the even older “New World Order”. I believe this is a huge test. I think our gullibility has been being seriously tested. I mean to say that by implementing the “policies” that many government offices have as well as many corporations of course the “ESSENTIAL ONES” chosen by some pencil pushing, middle class destroying enemies of the people. That is one description Donald J Trump, 45th President of the UNITED STATES INC. and master of giving a major erection to the Senate, was spot on about. Love him, or hate him.. or see it how I do, the entire office any president occupies of for and In representation of said corporate government, or governmental services corporation essentially subcontracted under what was the current martial law jurisdiction of the Reconstruction Acts (so called) following the conclusion of the War between the American Confederation  the only lawful governing body convened according to international law defined as the US INC. by means of covert coup and overt offensive aggression A.K.A, the Federal Union or UNITED STATES then and currently according to mine, and many of my fellow colleagues research and investigation, is in substantive violation of the core principles it was founded upon, unless or until recognized as such, I can not, will not, unless I intend to violate the oath I took to support and defend the Constitution for the united States of America, can I recognize any office or act of it. As the majority of Americans have been indoctrinated into this extremely obvious oligarchical Communistic Communitarian criminal conspiracy and divided by as evil as evil can be two party divide and conquer system many of our founders warned us about including its extremely well known 10 plank agenda, abolition of private property, (YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY) implementation of a central bank, -(federal reserve) the abolition of the nuclear family, if people would dismiss the programmed response to call me a conspiracy theorist and just read our research and attempt to prove us wrong.... if they listened to us, we could still save the Republic for the American people. Implementing this agenda is the primary purpose of the main stream Zionist bought and paid for media. 

                                                 
——— onto the article 
published on the Ron Paul Institute website and titled

The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : The Journalistic Tattletale and Censorship Industry Suffers Several Well-Deserved Blows

Glenn Greenwald 

It is half adolescent and half malevolent. Its primary objectives are control, censorship, and the destruction of reputations for fun and power. Though its epicenter is the largest corporate media outlets, it is the very antithesis of journalism.



I’ve written before about one particularly toxic strain of this authoritarian “reporting.” Teams of journalists at three of the most influential corporate media outlets — CNN’s “media reporters” (Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy), NBC’s “disinformation space unit” (Ben Collins and Brandy Zadrozny), and the tech reporters of The New York Times (Mike Isaac, Kevin Roose, Sheera Frenkel) — devote the bulk of their “journalism” to searching for online spaces where they believe speech and conduct rules are being violated, flagging them, and then pleading that punitive action be taken (banning, censorship, content regulation, after-school detention). These hall-monitor reporters are a major factor explaining why tech monopolies, which (for reasons of self-interest and ideology) never wanted the responsibility to censor, now do so with abandon and seemingly arbitrary blunt force: they are shamed by the world’s loudest media companies when they do not.

Just as the NSA is obsessed with ensuring there be no place on earth where humans can communicate free of their spying eyes and ears, these journalistic hall monitors cannot abide the idea that there can be any place on the internet where people are free to speak in ways they do not approve. Like some creepy informant for a state security apparatus, they spend their days trolling the depths of chat rooms and 4Chan bulletin boards and sub-Reddit threads and private communications apps to find anyone — influential or obscure — who is saying something they believe should be forbidden, and then use the corporate megaphones they did not build and could not have built but have been handed in order to silence and destroy anyone who dissents from the orthodoxies of their corporate managers or challenges their information hegemony.

An example of MSM insanity: 



Oliver Darcy has built his CNN career by sitting around with Brian Stelter petulantly pointing to people breaking the rules on social media and demanding tech executives make the rule-breakers disappear. The little crew of tattletale millennials assembled by NBC — who refer to their twerpy work with the self-glorifying title of “working in the disinformation space”: as intrepid and hazardous as exposing corruption by repressive regimes or reporting from war zones — spend their dreary days scrolling through 4Chan boards to expose the offensive memes and bad words used by transgressive adolescents; they then pat themselves on the back for confronting dangerous power centers, even when it is nothing more trivial and bullying than doxxing the identities of powerless, obscure citizens.

But the worst of this triumvirate is the NYT’s tech reporters, due to influence and reach if no other reason. When Silicon Valley monopolies, publicly pressured by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and other lawmakers, united to remove Parler from the internet, the Times’ tech team quickly donned their hall-monitor goggles and Stasi notebooks to warn that the Bad People had migrated to Signal and Telegram. This week they asked: “Are Private Messaging Apps the Next Misinformation Hot Spot?” One reporter “confess[ed] that I am worried about Telegram. Other than private messaging, people love to use Telegram for group chats — up to 200,000 people can meet inside a Telegram chat room. That seems problematic.”

These examples of journalism being abused to demand censorship of spaces they cannot control are too numerous to comprehensively chronicle. And they are not confined to those three outlets. That far more robust censorship is urgently needed is now a virtual consensus in mainstream corporate journalism: it’s an animating cause for them.

Fair Use Excerpt. Read the whole article here.

Friday, February 5, 2021

WHEN YOU CANT EVEN ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT the COVID VAX as FAR AS IM CONCERNED THAT NULLIFIES EVEN CONSIDERING IT

It’s not just that you can’t ask questions. Big Pharma has been given immunity from liability claims. That, for me is the end of any discussion. 

Government bypasses all of the normal safety testing that find drugs that pass to still have major issues. Here is my former broadcast colleague Ben Swann’s report . This is what an “actual” journalist sounds and presents himself as.

Truth is pure. I would like to thank Ben for all his continuing excellent reports. 


Sunday, January 24, 2021

BASEBALL STAR HANK AARON DEAD - LAST SEEN PUBLICLY 2WEEKS AGO TAKING COVID SHOT - CIVIL RIGHTS RIOTS WARS HE SURVIVED - BUT NOT THE AGE OF COVID

ATLANTA — Hank Aaron, who endured racist threats with stoic dignity during his pursuit of Babe Ruth’s home run record and gracefully left his mark as one of baseball’s greatest all-around players, didn’t survive the age of COVID after being stuck and he died Friday. He was 86.








The Atlanta Braves, Mr. Aaron’s longtime team, said he died peacefully in his sleep. Although I highly doubt “the team” was with him in his bedroom, so perhaps they were told by whomever gave Hank care. No cause was given.

Mr. Aaron made his last public appearance just 2 1/2 weeks ago, when he received the COVID-19 vaccine. He said he wanted to help spread the to Black Americans that the vaccine was safe.

“Hammerin’ Hank” set a wide array of career hitting records during a 23-year career spent mostly with the Milwaukee and Atlanta Braves, including RBIs, extra-base hits and total bases.

But the Hall of Famer will be remembered for one swing above all others, the one that made him baseball’s home-run king. The man survived through riots, civil rights, wars, but did not survive the COVID winter. Hmmm.

Saturday, January 23, 2021

TWITTER - PUBLISHING CHILD PORN - REFUSES to REMOVE UNTIL DHS GOT INVOLVED SAYS LAWSUIT

Thursday, January 7, 2021

TRUMP SAYS Rep #AdamSCHIFF-for-brains should be tried for TREASON

“President Trump has suggested Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) should face “arrest for treason” after he “illegally made up a FAKE & terrible statement” that he read out in Congress in an attempt to frame the president.”

For the second time in days, President Trump has accused a Democratic member of Congress of treason, escalating his attacks on those leading an impeachment inquiry against him based on a complaint lodged by a “whistleblower” with no first-hand knowledge of events.

On Sunday, Trump tweeted that Schiff should be “questioned at the highest level” for “treason.”



Trump suggested in a tweet Monday that House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA) should face “arrest for treason,” claiming Schiff “illegally made up a FAKE & terrible statement.

The U.S. Constitution defines treason as waging war on the U.S. or giving “aid and comfort” to American enemies. Punishment for the crime may include the death penalty.

During a House hearing Thursday, Schiff tried to ramp up criticism of President Trump portraying him as a mob boss.

It reads like a classic organized crime shakedown,” Schiff said of Trump’s call. “Shorn of its rambling character and in not so many words, this is the essence of what the president communicates.

He then parodied Trump’s call in wildly inaccurate terms.

We’ve been very good to your country, very good. No other country has done as much as we have, but you know what? I don’t see much reciprocity here,” Schiff said, supposedly “parodying” Trump’s demands to the Ukrainian leader. “I have a favor I want from you, though, and I’m gonna say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand, lots of it.”

Schiff explained he was trying to make clear what the president “was trying to communicate with the president of Ukraine.”

This is, in some character, what the president was trying to communicate with the president of Ukraine,” Schiff said. “It would be funny if it wasn’t such a graphic betrayal of the president’s oath of office.”

Schiff’s remarks received coverage from Fox News.

 

Tuesday, December 29, 2020

RTR TRUTH MEDIA: A HARD HITTING TRUTH TELLING YOUTUBER HAS PASSED ON - A Message for All

Brian Young covers this better than I can. We are all at a loss for the passing of this amazing truth teller and investigative journalist. Jeff Censored. You will he missed! 




Sunday, December 27, 2020

CARDINAL SMASHES the NEW NORMAL - GREAT RESET - MARXIST LEADERSHIP TAKING OVER AMERICA and more

Words can not express the face I made while watching and listening to this. Some say it’s all a part of the Hegelian Dialectic to keep people from leaving the church, some say it’s an old man who has no fear ... 

I still am forever going to refer to Cardinal Burke as
Cardinal Kick-Ass







Thursday, December 24, 2020

DOCTOR TESTIFIES to CONGRESS - VACCINE is not the ANSWER on COVID - PEER REVIEWED COVID RESPONSE TEAM PROVES




We at RTR have been as best we can reviewing the following content and reviewing opposing material related to it. We have found the doctor’s assertions are relevant, hold substantive value to public safety and have found no legitimate equally as comprehensive opposing investigation as to the date of publishing this article. It was said this method Dr. Kory suggests was tested and failed. It did not include the requisite additional step. 
See here - What Detractors Missed who Attempted to Discredit COVID Treatment


The below video was installed properly and fails to work on majority browsers. Leaving here for tech team to check -



What Detractors Missed who Attempted to Discredit COVID TreatmentWhat Detractors Missed who Attempted to Discredit COVID TreatmentWhat Detractors Missed who Attempted to Discredit COVID Treatment

Sunday, December 6, 2020

LOCOMOTIVE BREATH CAUSES MASK COMPLIANCE TASK FORCE to BECOME YOUTUBE FAMOUS



I just never seem to realize that the level of insanity or my perception of insanity is more common than the exception. Masks that do little but to suppress a bit of fear instilled in the minds of the masses by main stream media ... oh for God’s sake. 

Let my people go!!!  

Tuesday, November 17, 2020

PENNSYLVANIA VOTE COUNT COMPLETELY ILLEGITIMATE - KEYS TO ENTIRE VOTING SYSTEM WERE STOLEN - BIDEN ONLY PASSED TRUMP IN the DARK of NIGHT

RTR TRUTH MEDIA - Allow me to first state clearly to those who may not have read this publication before... I am absolutely NOT a fan of Donald J. (Take the guns and worry about due process later - Bolshevik Red Flag Law) Trump. I have absolutely no dog in this fight because I am dissatisfied either way in different ways. But there was absolutely voter and election fraud. 




That is not only blatantly obvious, but I feel once again like I was watching that reporter continue to ask the same question of the White House press secretary that was so thoroughly answered you would have to be brain dead not to get. 

This is the full exchange not the cut apart. The President doesn’t know specifically who the “proud boys are and therefore was only slightly more broad in his position. Understandable considering the answer he did give was crystal clear.





While the main stream media election fraud deniers continue to tell Americans, or more accurately lie through their teeth to Americans about their poster child Sleepy Touchy Feely Uncle Joe with the leg hair he enjoyed children to pet and whose lap enjoys entertaining them while thinking also of cockaroaches (you really can’t make this stuff up) and key to really get one if the most morally bankrupt NeoMarxists in office, here we have irrefutable evidence that the deciding county’s essential keys to the integrity and security of their election was stolen just before the election. That for us is a slam dunk on corporate media being an accessory at least after the fact. Denying it any longer is tantamount to willful and intentional deception. Freedom of speech has “limitations” we are always hearing. Considering the 1st Amendment truly only meant either political speech (criticizing your government) or in matters that expose crimes committed, duties neglected, or agendas supported or not, it does not mean that large corporations are free to deceive .